Talk:Linton Park/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BelovedFreak 11:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead needs to adequately summarise article per WP:LEAD.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Citations to reliable sources, no problems.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Stays focussed. I can't think of anything missing, and the sources I looked at don't show any major omissions here.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No issues.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are free with appropriate licenses & information. They have appropriate captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• As I'm sure you know, the lead needs to summarise the article per WP:LEAD :)
  • I always forget to expand the lead, when I'm done. Now done.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
• Should "18th century" be "18th-century" (adjective)?
  • It should. Done.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

History

• "Sir Horace Mann was a friend and long-time correspondent with Horace Walpole." - perhaps "Sir Horace Mann was a friend and long-time correspondent of Horace Walpole."?
  • I couldn't decide whether to use "of" or "with". Changed.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Buildings

• I think architectural descriptions can be quite hard-going for the average Joe and so I would consider linking:
  • bays
    • Done--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
  • moulded
    • Done--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
  • portico
    • Already linked in second paragraph of building--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
  • cantilevered
    • Done--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
• "ice house" or "ice-house"? (you have both)
  • Fixed.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Park

• Consider linking balustrade
  • Done--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Access

• Just a suggestion, not a requirement, but this would perhaps be better merged into the former section, if it's never going to be longer than a sentence. It seems like it would fit.
  • OK. Done.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

No links to disambiguation pages. External links all look like they're working. Spot checks of sources I can access show no problems with WP:V or plagiarism/copyvio.

Nice work, I enjoyed reading this. No real issues holding back promotion other than the expansion of the lead. I'll put it on hold.--BelovedFreak 20:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm glad you liked it. I'm working my way through writing articles on all of the Grade I listed buildings in the borough of Maidstone.--DavidCane (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for making those changes. I'm happy to list it as a good article, well done! (Look forward to seeing more of the same...) --BelovedFreak 10:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)