Talk:Hurricane Fausto (2008)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 15:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Meteorological history section, "The origins of Hurricane Fausto were in a westward-moving tropical wave that moved off the eastern coast". Moving/moved...please reword.

Meteorological history section, "A deep-layer area of high pressure". I'm not sure what is meant by "deep-layer area".

Preparations and impact, "Fausto made its closest approach to the island about 115 mi (185 km) from the island." To the island/from the island...please reword.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Overall a nice article. Just a few prose tweaks needed, so I'm placing the review on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Dana boomer (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've fixed the three issues, thanks for the review :) Cyclone biskit 17:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]