Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• No issues

Lead

• No issues

Design and description

• No issues

Career

• Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
  • The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Legacy

• Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection
  • Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Notes

• No issues

Bibliography

• No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 19:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 00:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)