Talk:Cyclone Giri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleCyclone Giri has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 30, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Info Box

[edit]

everything in the info box is wrong...15jan19932010 (talk) 11:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry, we are updating it time to time and i will see that all information is correct by the time the system makes landfall. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the infobox is fully correct.Jason Rees (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry 15jan19932010, when I created the page, everything was in a confusion as the information was not updated in the main season page and the storm was going through rapid intensification. Sorry if any inconvenience was caused. Thanks to Anirudh Emani.Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I dont need thanks, i was just updating it time to time. Anirudh EmaniSay something 09:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope

[edit]

I just hope that the storm does not cause heavy damage. Cyclone Nargis hit the same region 2 years ago and was devastating. PI just hope that they are strong enough to tackle this storm, as this appears to be stronger than Nargis. Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got mixed up with the season live information and the maximum storm strength at its peak. Why is the 1 min winds set at 180mph. I put it back to 155mph after realising that this was the individual storm page but it says 180mph winds.

Yeah, it is possible that the system may not cause that much devastation as compared to Nargis. Nargis made landfall further south in the low lying areas of Irrawaddy. Giri is making landfall to the north where the land is high enough to take the rainwater and storm surge. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Storm Path

[edit]

Storm path on the map is different from satellite image of IMD. http://www.imd.gov.in/section/satmet/dynamic/insatnequad-vis.htm Yarzaryeni (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry, our members will update it soon. However, the JTWC path is used, not IMD. Anirudh EmaniSay something 10:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Giri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 07:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Images are suitable, and appropriately licensed on Commons. (I don't suppose there's any chance of there being any available "aftermath" images to add to the article?)
  • Article meets MOS format standards, has an infobox.
  • References appear to be reliable; inline citations are in appropriate places. (Suggest putting a link to reference [50] rght after the "going to be a sham anyways" comment, just to satisfy any quibblers.)
  • No apparent CP/CV issues, article satisifes the V/N/RS holy trinity
  • Subject is broadly covered without unnecessary diversions from the topic.
  • Article is neutral and stable.
  • Grammar and wordsmithing quibbles:
Lede
Meterological history
Preparations
Impact
Aftermath
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 42 external links on Cyclone Giri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very or Extremely?

[edit]

It is just my opinion that the official classification of this storm should either be "Very Severe" or "Extremely Severe" and stick to one or the other throughout the article including the info box and opening statement because at present they contradict each other. I dont use commas. Cthomau5 (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]