Talk:Common eland/GA2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | As far as animal articles go, this one is good for this criteria | ✓ Pass |
(b) (MoS) | Passes here | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | All refs are acceptable, useful, and pass. | ✓ Pass |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | All citations in article are reliable | ✓ Pass |
(c) (original research) | Yes, it appears so | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | Follows textbook form for organism articles, and covers vital points well. | ✓ Pass |
(b) (focused) | Indeed. | ✓ Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Neutral defines this article. | ✓ Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No edits disputes, wars, or conflicts | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Creative and applicable image usage. | ✓ Pass |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Adheres to this category. | ✓ Pass |
Result
[edit]Result | Notes |
---|---|
✓ Pass | All in all, this article has the stuff to be a GA! |
Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Please add any related discussion here. Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC) This a well- done article, so I will go ahead and make it a GA!Oakley77 (talk) 02:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)