Talk:Bob Glenalvin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk09:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Glenalvin
Bob Glenalvin

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 22:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - The source says: ...Dowling began playing semi-professional, and on account of the objection of his parents he adopted the name of R. J. Glenalvin. The hook and WP article imply he needed permission, which is not supported by the source. It only says he changed names because of their unspecificed objection.
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'll wait for the Newspapers.com clippings to be updated before looking at the sources for close paraphrasing.—Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC) —Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: I have the following comments:

  • His parents objected to him playing professional baseball, and only consented to it if he used an assumed name: Source only says his name change was prompted by their objection. It doesn't say specifically that they objected to baseball or "consented" to him playing. Need to get the article in sync with the source, and then likewise with the hook(s).
  • "Early life": Cited source for birthday says 1868 not 1867.
  • Assuming he never legally changed his name, it seems Dowling should be the first name in the lead sentence per MOS:LEGALNAME.—Bagumba (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba: – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: Approve Alt1, which is ok with that source. "Refuse" in the main hook seems too controlling, assuming he was an adult, but something along the lines of "object" would be ok, but I think it leaves some intrigue to not mention it. It's up to you if you want to re-propose. I have no strong feelings on the birth year, other than the text was inconsistent with that cited source.—Bagumba (talk) 05:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]