Talk:Bedford Castle

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bedford Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015151458/http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/CommunityAndLiving/ArchivesAndRecordOffice/CommunityArchives/Bedford/BedfordCastle.aspx to http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/communityandliving/archivesandrecordoffice/communityarchives/bedford/bedfordcastle.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015151458/http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/CommunityAndLiving/ArchivesAndRecordOffice/CommunityArchives/Bedford/BedfordCastle.aspx to http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/communityandliving/archivesandrecordoffice/communityarchives/bedford/bedfordcastle.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015151458/http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/CommunityAndLiving/ArchivesAndRecordOffice/CommunityArchives/Bedford/BedfordCastle.aspx to http://www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/communityandliving/archivesandrecordoffice/communityarchives/bedford/bedfordcastle.aspx
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.csaenvironmental.co.uk/view-project/764c87dfc8835d7890797542/Archaeological+Park'2C+Bedford+Castle+/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Inaccurate or confused/mistaken number

The article says "Falkes had left the castle, along with around eighty men, in charge of his brother". This definitely wrong and apparently misplace. According to accounts, 80 men were hanged which is obviously the source for the number. The same number seems to be cited on the net as also being the number the brother entered the castle with. The real number should be quite higher: The men to be sent on the crusade; those that died when the gate house was taken and the weeks long skirmishes afterwards within the outer bailey; the breach of the inner bailey wall etc. At the very least the 80 number should be moved to the hanging statement. Mightyname (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)