Talk:A Retrospective (Pink Martini album)/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sources

[edit]
Extended content

--Another Believer (Talk) 17:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This review is transcluded from Talk:A Retrospective (Pink Martini album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BigDom (talk · contribs) 14:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Made a couple of very minor changes but prose is good overall.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Good range of sources used
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Very nice article. On first glance, I thought it might be a bit short but after reading through and checking the sources all the relevant info has been included. No problems passing this one, well done. BigDom 16:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Retrospective (Pink Martini album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marking as correct. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]