User contributions for Terlipressin
A user with 10 edits. Account created on 12 January 2008.
18 February 2008
- 05:2705:27, 18 February 2008 diff hist +741 Talk:Eve Online →Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
- 05:2005:20, 18 February 2008 diff hist +312 Eve Online No conclusion was reached. One side claiming they have conclusion doesn't make it so
8 February 2008
- 02:4102:41, 8 February 2008 diff hist +312 Eve Online See talk page. This particular forum has proven itself reliable
- 02:3802:38, 8 February 2008 diff hist +1,850 Talk:Eve Online →Most recent change to the misconduct section
4 February 2008
- 06:4106:41, 4 February 2008 diff hist +468 Talk:Eve Online →Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
- 05:4005:40, 4 February 2008 diff hist +184 Talk:Eve Online →little confusion
- 05:3805:38, 4 February 2008 diff hist +888 Talk:Eve Online No edit summary
- 05:2905:29, 4 February 2008 diff hist +970 Eve Online Considering Kugutsumen was actually right and telling the truth while the company was at best disingenuous at worst outright dishonest, I certainly would count it as reliable
22 January 2008
- 05:3605:36, 22 January 2008 diff hist +567 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Do we accept sources that cannot be publicly accessed (and thus verified)?
- 05:1305:13, 22 January 2008 diff hist +1,204 Eve Online Arguing online sources not valid for an entirely online game? Laughable. Entire thing stinks to high heaven. Sure don't see any "consensus" here either
