User contributions for Simpleshooter99
A user with 222 edits. Account created on 20 June 2022.
18 December 2022
- 16:0316:03, 18 December 2022 diff hist +613 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users: Last reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5915:59, 18 December 2022 diff hist +903 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:2615:26, 18 December 2022 diff hist −911 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:5614:56, 18 December 2022 diff hist +3,483 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 11:2111:21, 18 December 2022 diff hist +351 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →18 December 2022
- 11:1611:16, 18 December 2022 diff hist +937 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users
- 08:3808:38, 18 December 2022 diff hist +526 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Destinyseeker89 →Comments by other users: First off, that's not even a qualification for socking
- 01:2001:20, 18 December 2022 diff hist +746 2022 COVID-19 protests in China →International: That's valid information and with a strong professional source. Unlike much of the article that cherrpicks individual protesters as if they speak for everyone. A senior US official is not just anybody and CNN is unlikely to lie about what that senior official had said. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 01:1001:10, 18 December 2022 diff hist +348 2022 COVID-19 protests in China It's not even specific information. It's overall information where most of the protests in the country were observed to be allowed to continue for hours. Hundreds of people had gathered in the capital Beijing for several hours on that day singing the national anthem and listening to speeches. They were mostly allowed to go home afterwards and only a few scuffles. It should be in the lede. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
15 December 2022
- 12:1612:16, 15 December 2022 diff hist −11 Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China →200 or 2000 students at Tsinghua? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 12:1512:15, 15 December 2022 diff hist +1,016 Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China →200 or 2000 students at Tsinghua University: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 12:0412:04, 15 December 2022 diff hist −1,316 2022 COVID-19 protests in China I see it was actually already mentioned below. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 11:4711:47, 15 December 2022 diff hist +1,316 2022 COVID-19 protests in China Added in a Beijing section because there were also large protests there and noteworthy. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:5010:50, 15 December 2022 diff hist +747 2022 COVID-19 protests in China Add commentary from the white house stating that they didn't want to politicise the anticovid protest and overstate and make it seem like something that it's not. Add CNN citation. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:0510:05, 15 December 2022 diff hist +971 Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China →Majority aim of the protest: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:0110:01, 15 December 2022 diff hist +317 2022 COVID-19 protests in China That's not very accurate. According to videos and BBC reports, police have largely allowed the rallies to continue. There were some scuffles yet the article omits the fact that actually many peaceful protests were not violently suppressed but had been allowed to continue https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63771109 Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 02:2102:21, 15 December 2022 diff hist +566 Talk:Anthem of Hong Kong →Anthem, not “national anthem”
- 01:2701:27, 15 December 2022 diff hist +308 Talk:Anthem of Hong Kong No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
14 December 2022
- 23:1023:10, 14 December 2022 diff hist −168 Anthem of Hong Kong →Other uses: Redundant. It's already been well mentioned below and shouldn't be repeated twice over.. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
13 December 2022
- 03:2503:25, 13 December 2022 diff hist −214 Anthem of Hong Kong Why am I explaining here why Hong Kong is a part of China? Not necessary and also excessive, and should just keep it simple and to the point especially for a disambiguation page. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:5902:59, 13 December 2022 diff hist −23 Nanjing Massacre Memorial Day Too redundant and shortened it to the main point only. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:4702:47, 13 December 2022 diff hist +33 Glory to Hong Kong No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3602:36, 13 December 2022 diff hist −2 Anthem of Hong Kong More accurate term is dubbed. There is a difference between knowing and stating on what is the official anthem. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3302:33, 13 December 2022 diff hist +2 Anthem of Hong Kong Separatists is not a neutral term. There's no proof that they are actually wanting separatism or independence from China so it's not substantiated. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:5601:56, 13 December 2022 diff hist −1 Anthem of Hong Kong No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:5501:55, 13 December 2022 diff hist +36 Anthem of Hong Kong Fixed NPOV. Previous edits flat out implies that it's supposed to have a national anthem. Why would it? Why should Hong Kong be expected to have its own national anthem? Gave straight appropriate facts instead. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
11 December 2022
- 23:4623:46, 11 December 2022 diff hist +457 Zhanqiao Pier Add supporting source. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:3523:35, 11 December 2022 diff hist +597 N User:Simpleshooter99 Disclosure Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2923:29, 11 December 2022 diff hist −175 User talk:Simpleshooter99 →Omg, finally logged in: Shortened Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2723:27, 11 December 2022 diff hist +742 User talk:Simpleshooter99 →Omg, finally logged in. 🤦: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2023:20, 11 December 2022 diff hist +253 Tsingtao Brewery It's of the iconic Huilan Pavilion that is well known in their local area. Added missing citation from Lonely planet. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
24 November 2022
- 00:5200:52, 24 November 2022 diff hist +350 First Opium War As in Britannica: the tensions between two sides grew deeper when British refused to let its subjects be trialed in Chinese courts, and the British also later destroyed a blockade. https://www.britannica.com/summary/Key-Facts-of-the-Opium-Wars Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 November 2022
- 19:4819:48, 23 November 2022 diff hist −9 First Opium War No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2916:29, 23 November 2022 diff hist +1 m First Opium War Fixed typo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:1316:13, 23 November 2022 diff hist +404 First Opium War Add accessible sources where the full translated letter can be read from. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:0316:03, 23 November 2022 diff hist +48 First Opium War The main obvious outcome of the war was that the opium trade continued. Previous edit doesn't mention the continuation of opium trade. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:5215:52, 23 November 2022 diff hist +21 First Opium War See talk. The British government had disregarded Chinese soverign laws as if a ban on opium trade shouldn't apply to the Brits and that is what led to the war . Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:4815:48, 23 November 2022 diff hist +1,087 Talk:First Opium War →Free trade wasn't the Chinese laws: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:3115:31, 23 November 2022 diff hist +47 First Opium War Free trade isn't a principle that benefits all parties. Opium was ruining China economically and socially and making the British rich. It's not neutral to claim that the British only did this as they cared about free trade as if they weren't the ones profiting majorly for breaking the laws. It should be noted that the opium trade is illegal at the minimum and was not Chinese laws. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 November 2022
- 11:2911:29, 20 November 2022 diff hist +47 Second Opium War Wow, it's amazing how the intro chapter doesn't mention one of the most historically significant outcomes of the war. - The successful Legalization of the opium trade which of course benefitted the British merchants disportionately. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4510:45, 20 November 2022 diff hist +660 Talk:First Opium War →Anti war views in Intro: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:3510:35, 20 November 2022 diff hist +11 First Opium War That's not the reason for the war but just very biased revisionism to blame the Chinese for refusing to buy British opium. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
15 November 2022
- 22:5222:52, 15 November 2022 diff hist −2 Jackson Wang No reason given for reverting. He is of Chinese nationality. Not Hong Kong nationality. Give reason or discuss on Talk in why you think that's factually wrong Tag: Undo
- 01:5801:58, 15 November 2022 diff hist −2 Jackson Wang (MOS) Hong Kong is part of the country of China. He is Chinese from China and the country should be noted predominantly. Not the province. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
8 September 2022
- 06:0306:03, 8 September 2022 diff hist +4 Opium Wars No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:5305:53, 8 September 2022 diff hist +12 Opium Wars No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:4605:46, 8 September 2022 diff hist +512 Wikipedia:Teahouse →Britannica: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 05:3705:37, 8 September 2022 diff hist +44 Opium Wars There's a proper term for it that's woefully missing in article. In that era, treaty of nanking, etc were known as (unequal treaties). Added wiki link to the important term. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:2805:28, 8 September 2022 diff hist +43 Opium Wars No mention in lede that opium was illegal in China and that the country was punishing them for breaking their laws. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
2 September 2022
- 15:4215:42, 2 September 2022 diff hist −9 Hilton Kuala Lumpur Manual of style - no need to put the exact street address. Fixed up a little. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: copyedit
