User contributions for SansBias
A user with 13 edits. Account created on 9 June 2015.
22 June 2015
- 01:2101:21, 22 June 2015 diff hist +533 User talk:SansBias No edit summary
21 June 2015
- 10:0110:01, 21 June 2015 diff hist +295 User talk:SansBias →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
- 09:5409:54, 21 June 2015 diff hist +1,742 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667850927 by Edward321 (talk)
- 00:2900:29, 21 June 2015 diff hist +1,742 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667823895 by Keri (talk) Woerlee is not a qualified neuroscientist
20 June 2015
- 21:4521:45, 20 June 2015 diff hist +1,702 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Talk:Pam Reynolds_case#Balancing_Woerlee: new section
- 21:4021:40, 20 June 2015 diff hist +135 Talk:Pam Reynolds case →Balancing Woerlee
- 21:3021:30, 20 June 2015 diff hist +1,742 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667714648 by 76.107.171.90 (talk) NPOV, biased exclusion of real scientific research.. Woerlee is not a neroscientist. He is not an expert in this field.
19 June 2015
- 21:0621:06, 19 June 2015 diff hist +1,973 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667561553 by LuckyLouie (talk) Woerlee is not a scientst. The redactor clearly is biased against academic contributions
- 21:0421:04, 19 June 2015 diff hist −257 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667562410 by LuckyLouie (talk)
- 21:0421:04, 19 June 2015 diff hist +26 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 667562677 by LuckyLouie (talk)
18 June 2015
- 21:2521:25, 18 June 2015 diff hist +1,973 Pam Reynolds case Undid revision 666664721 by Chainsaw Maniac (talk) This edit was undone because it clearly violates the NPOV standard. Many esteemed academics were referenced in this text.
10 June 2015
- 12:0012:00, 10 June 2015 diff hist +1,980 Pam Reynolds case →Reception
9 June 2015
- 17:0617:06, 9 June 2015 diff hist +390 Pam Reynolds case No edit summary
