User contributions for S-Ranger

1 December 2017

• 18:4518:45, 1 December 2017 diff hist +4,218‎ Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor ‎ →‎Cleanup tags: - response
• 18:4318:43, 1 December 2017 diff hist −4,212‎ m Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor ‎ →‎BosWash?: - no idea how anything ended up in this section
• 18:1818:18, 1 December 2017 diff hist +3,884‎ Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor ‎ →‎Citation of sources: explanation

24 January 2017

• 00:3400:34, 24 January 2017 diff hist −60‎ Quebec City–Windsor Corridor ‎ Cite credible (StatsCan, Ontario or Quebec government) sources or delete the article. Stats Con told me, in 2001, that they keep no stats on the Windsor-Quebec City Corridor.
• 00:0600:06, 24 January 2017 diff hist +649‎ Quebec City–Windsor Corridor ‎ Where are the sources? There are none, as is.

23 January 2017

• 23:0723:07, 23 January 2017 diff hist −1‎ m Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor (Via Rail) ‎ →‎Merge with Quebec City–Windsor Corridor: -just typos
• 23:0523:05, 23 January 2017 diff hist +542‎ Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor (Via Rail) ‎ →‎Merge with Quebec City–Windsor Corridor
• 22:5922:59, 23 January 2017 diff hist +549‎ Talk:Quebec City–Windsor Corridor (Via Rail) ‎ Sources, please

13 November 2016

• 12:2512:25, 13 November 2016 diff hist −10‎ m Golden Horseshoe ‎ Removed "secondary" from the first sentence. There is nothing secondary about the Golden Horseshoe in Ontario or Canada.

9 May 2013

• 18:2918:29, 9 May 2013 diff hist 0‎ m Lateralization of brain function ‎ Tags go after punctuation, cosmetic just moved comma before citation needed tag.

1 January 2012

• 19:0719:07, 1 January 2012 diff hist 0‎ m Windows Phone ‎ Cosmetic: punctuation before tags

1 March 2011

• 06:3206:32, 1 March 2011 diff hist −26‎ m Twitter ‎ →‎Growth: removed duplicate ", according to the company." Sentence already states "By March 2010, the company..." and then the cite speaks for itself.

26 July 2009

• 20:0420:04, 26 July 2009 diff hist 0‎ m QWERTY ‎ →‎Alternatives to QWERTY: Cosmetic. Punctuation goes before tags.
• 19:2119:21, 26 July 2009 diff hist 0‎ m QWERTY ‎ Punctuation (,) goes before tags

4 May 2007

• 00:4500:45, 4 May 2007 diff hist 0‎ m Mississauga ‎ Intro: sixth most populous → sixth-most populous.
• 00:4100:41, 4 May 2007 diff hist −29‎ m Mississauga ‎ Intro: Please stop screwing with commas and paranthesis or pick one and stick to it. Remove all from one comma to the next and the sentence must make sense as with (...).

28 April 2007

• 19:5219:52, 28 April 2007 diff hist −2‎ m Mississauga ‎ Intro: Cosmetic (and opinion; feel free to revert or change it in any way). "As a suburb of Toronto, its growth is..." --> "As a suburb, Mississauga's growth is attributed to..."
• 19:4319:43, 28 April 2007 diff hist +7‎ m Mississauga ‎ In the intro it stated that Mississauga "has doubled" in population, with no citation/proof as usual. The Demographics section states "almost double" with no citation either so "almost" is it for now
• 04:1204:12, 28 April 2007 diff hist −6‎ m Mississauga ‎ →‎Demographics: "...reflection a MAJOR LARGE immigrant population?" with nothing but unfounded hearsay as usual? Nothing around Mississauga is "large" let alone whatever "major large" is.
• 04:0704:07, 28 April 2007 diff hist +527‎ Mississauga ‎ →‎Economy: Nothing in the section has been verified for months, it only takes two seconds to do what policy states and delete ALL unreferenced specific facts being thrown around; but commented out.
• 03:5003:50, 28 April 2007 diff hist −26‎ m Mississauga ‎ After reviewing lots of municipal articles I could still be wrong, it could still be a mess (too much for the first paragraph) but "founded/incorporated in" seems to usually go right after the name.
• 03:4503:45, 28 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Mississauga ‎ One sentence in the intro (Mississaugans) moved to the usual spot in most intros, even though it's not directly related to the rest of the paragraph, it has to go somewhere.
• 03:3703:37, 28 April 2007 diff hist +7‎ m Mississauga ‎ Added wiki-link for first mention of Toronto, given that not even most "Canadians" have a clue where (or what or much of anything else) Toronto really is, let alone global audiences on the web.
• 03:3003:30, 28 April 2007 diff hist +98‎ m Mississauga ‎ Who/what ever said that "over 55 new high-rise residential buildings have been approved ..." and if anyone then where is the proper verification? Commented out.
• 02:1202:12, 28 April 2007 diff hist −281‎ m Mississauga ‎ Whatever paragraph 9 (duplicated below anyway) was ever trying to explain with no sources is now gone (commented out) until it is properly sourced.

27 April 2007

• 21:0021:00, 27 April 2007 diff hist +26‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Most of the cites in "Notes and sources" (<references />) were in the format last, first name of authors, so I changed my references to match.
• 20:3820:38, 27 April 2007 diff hist +21‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 3, sentence 2: re-worded from "Controvery erupted 'when in the debate over the 2002 budget' ... moved "in the debate over..." to the end of the sentence.
• 20:2020:20, 27 April 2007 diff hist +244‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Finally found a source for Ford's year of birth. Uncommented (born 1969) and added source.

26 April 2007

• 23:2423:24, 26 April 2007 diff hist +305‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Sourced previous unfounded hearsay (that has to be watched around living persons or it could cause Wikimedia legal problems) re Ford not wanting homeless shelter in Ward 2.
• 23:1323:13, 26 April 2007 diff hist +603‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Did some searching around but could find nothing to back up anything but the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph up: commented out until properly sourced when it should be deleted outright, immediately
• 22:4822:48, 26 April 2007 diff hist +9‎ m Rob Ford ‎ "Born 1969" is not sourced, is not on his profile at Toronto.ca, so I commented it out for now until someone can source it.
• 22:4422:44, 26 April 2007 diff hist +205‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Bibliographies on living persons must have NO unsourced statements or they are deleted with no appeals, no nothing. Changed first two sentences into one and sourced the whole first paragraph.
• 22:3022:30, 26 April 2007 diff hist +250‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro last one (I think): Same, changed external URL into ref/cite and now it's all sort of consisent but all of the other <ref> cites are an inconsistent mess, but they already were anyway.
• 22:1622:16, 26 April 2007 diff hist +387‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 8. Changed external link to ref/cite as per the others above re: "and he announced his aplogy to the couple."
• 22:0522:05, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 9: Missed a ref with a space between it and "...like everyone else has to do between 9 and 5<space><ref>".
• 21:5021:50, 26 April 2007 diff hist +221‎ Rob Ford ‎ Intro, paragraph 6. External link changed to ref/cite (re: calling Lindsay Luby SAYS that Ford called her "a 'waste of skin'" and NOTHING ELSE in that citation).
• 21:3821:38, 26 April 2007 diff hist −2‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro continuing from paragraph 5. hammerblog only refers to the Toronto Star article, the last link is the Toronto Star article, so hammerblog cite is gone and Star (original) source is it.
• 21:3121:31, 26 April 2007 diff hist +196‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 5. Changed external link (re "Ford opposed to bike lanes...") to ref/cite as per previous similar edit (and a few more to go, cosmetic, nothing major).
• 21:2021:20, 26 April 2007 diff hist +246‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 3. Changed external link to ref/cite. It is recommended by the style guide that authors pick one consisten way to cite sources, not external URLs mixed with <ref> tags.
• 21:0221:02, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 7. Cosmetic. Same, removed space from "..."I'm working. Why don' you get a job?"<space><ref ...>
• 21:0021:00, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro, paragraph 6. Cosmetic. Removed space (line break, same difference) from "..."a waste of time" and a "low life."<space>[external_URL]
• 20:5720:57, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 5. Cosmetic. Same, removed space and newline from "...own fault at the end of the day."<space>[external_URL]
• 20:5120:51, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro paragraph 4. Cosmetic, same, removed space between "...and a "weasel" in council.<space><ref...>"
• 20:4620:46, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro: Cosmetic. Same, removed another space between "ethnic slur.<space><ref...>"
• 20:4420:44, 26 April 2007 diff hist −1‎ m Rob Ford ‎ Intro: Cosmetic. Removed space between "Ford has also made headlines for his outbursts in council.<space><ref...>. No spaces between references and punctuation.

10 April 2007

• 22:0922:09, 10 April 2007 diff hist +1,383‎ User talk:S-Ranger ‎ →‎Blocked: Thanks, Pomte ... I'm surprised anyone noticed

28 March 2007

• 23:4723:47, 28 March 2007 diff hist −37‎ m Talk:Toronto ‎ Too disgusted with Wikipedia to bother with anything (even moderaly productive) around it, free of charge only to have to deal with anal/insane wiki-heads (the ones who are ... goes wihout saying).

26 March 2007

• 23:5623:56, 26 March 2007 diff hist +654‎ User talk:S-Ranger ‎ →‎Image on Template:Maintained: APOLOGIES for the inadvertent change to the image!
• 23:4723:47, 26 March 2007 diff hist +112‎ m Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 21/Template:Maintained ‎ →‎[[Template:Maintained]]: And perhaps if I keep it up, I can demonstrate how worthless history pages are as well (though not intentional; more typos and re-wording of my own comment).
• 23:4123:41, 26 March 2007 diff hist +76‎ m Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 21/Template:Maintained ‎ →‎[[Template:Maintained]]: More re-wording (my own words)