User contributions for RhoNuPsiDelta
A user with 36 edits. Account created on 29 January 2021.
27 August 2021
- 05:3205:32, 27 August 2021 diff hist +14 Imelda Marcos Article matches all criteria for being an attack page. Recommended to be rewritten as stub until a more neutral version of the article is created. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:1905:19, 27 August 2021 diff hist +81 Maria Ressa No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 August 2021
- 02:3802:38, 23 August 2021 diff hist −2 Maria Ressa No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:3702:37, 23 August 2021 diff hist −460 Maria Ressa needs better third-party citation for flowery description of the news website Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:2402:24, 23 August 2021 diff hist +63 Maria Ressa added content Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:4701:47, 23 August 2021 diff hist +19 Picasa . Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
22 August 2021
- 10:1010:10, 22 August 2021 diff hist +43 Diehard Duterte Supporters needs etymology for the origin of the term i.e. who coined it, since it is a recent neologism Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:0810:08, 22 August 2021 diff hist +66 Diehard Duterte Supporters rewriting an easier to digest lede Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:0110:01, 22 August 2021 diff hist −442 Diehard Duterte Supporters this is an opinion piece not a fact. the lede is problematic because it focuses on the origin of the term instead of describing the actual group of people being referred to by the term. it should be immediately apparent what they are Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:5109:51, 22 August 2021 diff hist +58 Diehard Duterte Supporters No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:4509:45, 22 August 2021 diff hist −8 Diehard Duterte Supporters it wasn't just alleged. the group actually existst according to https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/04/06/you-can-die-any-time/death-squad-killings-mindanao (2009) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:4209:42, 22 August 2021 diff hist −11 Diehard Duterte Supporters removed wp:flowery Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:3609:36, 22 August 2021 diff hist −11 Diehard Duterte Supporters →See also: kpop irrelevant Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
14 February 2021
- 14:1614:16, 14 February 2021 diff hist +591 Talk:Fake news in the Philippines →This article needs to be deleted: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:2911:29, 14 February 2021 diff hist +831 Rappler →Controversies and Criticisms: added content regarding Rappler CEO's nobel prize nomination Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:2611:26, 14 February 2021 diff hist 0 Maria Ressa →Controversies and Criticisms: fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:2511:25, 14 February 2021 diff hist +823 Maria Ressa →Controversies and Criticisms: added recent criticism and source Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:1411:14, 14 February 2021 diff hist +141 Rappler →Controversies and Criticisms: added more citations/references Tags: citing a blog or free web host Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:0311:03, 14 February 2021 diff hist +275 Rappler →Controversies and Criticisms: Added another issue Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4610:46, 14 February 2021 diff hist −46 RJ Nieto Object404 keeps adding the word "controversial" to describe this article subject but insists on removing the same adjective on article subjects whose controversy are significant enough to have its own article. The bias is very obvious. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4110:41, 14 February 2021 diff hist +75 Rappler The issue about the subject is significant enough that it has its own article. Tag: Manual revert
- 10:3810:38, 14 February 2021 diff hist +91 m Maria Ressa Again, the detail about the subject is significant to have its own article so it should be on the intro. The detail was expounded on the below paragraphs anyway so why delete it? Tag: Manual revert
- 06:2106:21, 14 February 2021 diff hist +23 Rappler →Special Features: Dedicating an entire section to a specific feature is uncyclopeadic and looks more like an advert. Articles about other sites containing similar functions don't have sections like this. It wasn't newsworthy enough to even deserve its own section. Putting this under a more general section title instead. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 06:1906:19, 14 February 2021 diff hist +4 Rappler added more context and fixed the self-referential nature of the intro Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 06:1206:12, 14 February 2021 diff hist +91 Maria Ressa It's weird that the fact that Maria Ressa is a CONVICTED CYBERLIBELIST is being pushed down from the intro when that news is prominent enough to have its own article and deserves to be on top. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
12 February 2021
- 16:5216:52, 12 February 2021 diff hist −171 Rappler This detail is unimportant and uncyclopaedic. Plus its only reference was its own website and was not even newsworthy. Therefore, should be deleted for brevity. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5016:50, 12 February 2021 diff hist −127 Rappler This statement has no referenced citation. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:4816:48, 12 February 2021 diff hist −445 Rappler The provided citation reference link did not confirm the statement. There was not even a mention of rappler whatsoever. Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:3316:33, 12 February 2021 diff hist +289 Rappler →Ownership structure: addded content and new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:3016:30, 12 February 2021 diff hist −2,435 Rappler This looks more like a product advert than an actual encyclopiable fact that deserves a section. Should probably just get deleted. Tags: section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2716:27, 12 February 2021 diff hist +309 Maria Ressa →Bibliography: added new category and content Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 February 2021
- 19:3719:37, 6 February 2021 diff hist −21 Maria Ressa Let's not downplay her legal status in the Philippines. She's guilty until proven innocent. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 February 2021
- 14:4214:42, 5 February 2021 diff hist +6 Maria Ressa Quite some biases on this article trying to downplay someone's conviction for a crime while other articles directly label a person according to the crime they've been convicted for. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:3814:38, 5 February 2021 diff hist −613 Maria Ressa →Awards: A nomination is not an award. Plus the Nobel Prize website states a nominee cannot be revealed 50 years later. https://www.nobelprize.org/nomination/ Makes the "news" about the nomination dubious. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
31 January 2021
- 18:5318:53, 31 January 2021 diff hist +7 N User:RhoNuPsiDelta ←Created page with 'Hmmm...' Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit