User contributions for NonReproBlue
A user with 869 edits. Account created on 30 August 2020.
19 August 2021
- 23:0723:07, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1 Talk:Elvis Presley Null edit, that was an unintentional error when i was trying to resolve an edit conflict as you edited your comment while i was responding, the paragraph break made it look like two comments when i was reinserting it
- 22:5022:50, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1,332 Talk:Elvis Presley No edit summary
- 21:1921:19, 19 August 2021 diff hist 0 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 21:1421:14, 19 August 2021 diff hist +619 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 21:0621:06, 19 August 2021 diff hist +816 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 20:2220:22, 19 August 2021 diff hist +987 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 20:1020:10, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1,296 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 16:3016:30, 19 August 2021 diff hist +18 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 16:2716:27, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1,872 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 15:4415:44, 19 August 2021 diff hist +339 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we say, in wiki-voice, that the WIV was conducting "controversial gain-of-function research?"
- 15:2815:28, 19 August 2021 diff hist +271 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
- 15:1815:18, 19 August 2021 diff hist +936 Talk:Elvis Presley →RfC on Claims of Elvis's Jewish Ancestry
- 14:5914:59, 19 August 2021 diff hist −1 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
- 14:5814:58, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1,068 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
- 12:5112:51, 19 August 2021 diff hist +853 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
- 12:1912:19, 19 August 2021 diff hist +84 Criticism of the BBC →Criticism by China related to a "gloom filter": Source doesn't say anything about "diplomats", and attributes the claim that it is state sponsored. Replacing with direct quotes from source.
- 12:0512:05, 19 August 2021 diff hist −124 Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election →Description as an attempted coup: Doesn't appear to be a "split", as there is only one long list of news media doing it, and no list of any news media supposedly on the other side of the "split". Given that "split" isn't sourced, it seems to just be an inaccurate description of the sentences that follow.
- 11:5711:57, 19 August 2021 diff hist −23 January 6 United States Capitol attack →Historians' perspective: The citations are already there at the end of the paragraph.
- 11:3911:39, 19 August 2021 diff hist +5 Afro-Jamaicans No edit summary
- 11:3911:39, 19 August 2021 diff hist −2 Afro-Jamaicans Slight, but possibly important, difference in wording, per source.
- 11:3811:38, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1 Slavery in contemporary Africa →Types of contemporary slavery: missing comma
- 11:3211:32, 19 August 2021 diff hist +23 Afro-Jamaicans →Origin: The rest could also use a citation, but this in particular I cannot find backup for in any of the main articles or in a quick search of other sources.
- 11:2311:23, 19 August 2021 diff hist −75 Afro-Jamaicans Per source, which just states "Still, most mixed-race people in the country self-report as just 'Jamaican.'" Doesn't say anything about what people in other countries do, and doesn't say they also self-identify as black.
- 07:5507:55, 19 August 2021 diff hist +1,219 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
18 August 2021
- 13:3013:30, 18 August 2021 diff hist +1,382 Talk:Elvis Presley →Assessing accuracy of Jewish genealogy
- 13:0113:01, 18 August 2021 diff hist −47 Operation Northwoods Unnecessary qualification that seems to imply doubt that the body of the article does not support.
- 10:0610:06, 18 August 2021 diff hist −114 Kylie Moore-Gilbert →Detention in Iran: Source does not say this at all.
- 10:0310:03, 18 August 2021 diff hist −34 Kylie Moore-Gilbert Source doesn't mention "Western and Israeli media", and it doesn't use doubting terminology like "claim". It says "Iran has launched a media misinformation campaign to justify its claim that the freed academic Kylie Moore-Gilbert was a spy, accusing her of coordinating with a former Bahraini MP to steal secrets for Israel."
17 August 2021
- 23:1923:19, 17 August 2021 diff hist −15 Juan Williams →Fox News Channel: removing editorializing
- 23:1023:10, 17 August 2021 diff hist −8 Juan Williams Rv unsourced change. We don't add unsourced changes to BLPs “to show his bias”
- 16:4916:49, 17 August 2021 diff hist +603 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we say, in wiki-voice, that the WIV was conducting "controversial gain-of-function research?"
- 13:0913:09, 17 August 2021 diff hist −52 Bangor Daily News RV unexplained POV edits
15 August 2021
- 16:1716:17, 15 August 2021 diff hist +3 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Snopes in light of the latest revelations
- 16:1616:16, 15 August 2021 diff hist +572 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Snopes in light of the latest revelations
- 15:1315:13, 15 August 2021 diff hist +793 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Snopes in light of the latest revelations
- 14:4914:49, 15 August 2021 diff hist +1,109 Abby Martin Undid revision 1025546223 by Apeholder (talk) Well sourced. No indication that there is a consensus that Tablet is an unreliable source, and it is not the only source cited. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:5613:56, 15 August 2021 diff hist −93 Death of Mary Jane Barker No mention of these on page
- 13:4113:41, 15 August 2021 diff hist +30 Death of Rebecca Zahau →Evidence considered: Source attributes this to the attorney, we shouldn't state it in Wiki voice
- 13:2213:22, 15 August 2021 diff hist −93 Death of Alonzo Brooks No edit summary
- 07:5707:57, 15 August 2021 diff hist +40 Olivia Podmore Undid revision 1038487517 by Kevin McE (talk) Saying the source is wrong and linking a primary source document is original research. Furthermore, the source linked includes qualification criteria for athletes as well as nations. "To be eligible to participate in the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, all athletes must: ... Have at least 10 UCI points in an Olympic qualifying event." Tag: Undo
14 August 2021
- 21:5121:51, 14 August 2021 diff hist +10 Absolute Proof Undid revision 1038794503 by 146.168.169.34 (talk)We follow what RS say, this IS the neutral way to describe it. Whitewashing it would be non-neutral Tag: Undo
- 16:2516:25, 14 August 2021 diff hist −228 White Men Can't Jump →Plot: Totally unnecessary, and "never degrades his race" just seems like very poor phrasing. Summed up fine by the first sentence.
- 15:5115:51, 14 August 2021 diff hist +1 Talk:January 6 United States Capitol attack →Day of the week in the lead sentence.
- 15:5115:51, 14 August 2021 diff hist +1,127 Talk:January 6 United States Capitol attack →Day of the week in the lead sentence.
- 13:2313:23, 14 August 2021 diff hist +459 Talk:January 6 United States Capitol attack →The wording of the lead sentence
- 09:0009:00, 14 August 2021 diff hist +22 Absolute Proof Undid revision 1038671575 by 71.139.42.250 (talk) not a typo Tag: Undo
13 August 2021
- 13:4213:42, 13 August 2021 diff hist +29 The Project (Australian TV program) →Controversy: Controversy is perhaps still too strong a word, but as previously worded it made it seem as though the show was somehow supportive of him by having him as a guest, and that this was the controversy.
- 13:3013:30, 13 August 2021 diff hist −455 The Project (Australian TV program) →Controversy: Sources don't say that Aly "defended Sharia law against criticism" and they don't present this as a controversy. They present it simply as a very civil discussion.
- 13:2613:26, 13 August 2021 diff hist −641 The Project (Australian TV program) →Controversy: Article no longer exists in order to check it for verification, but from what I can tell this was more of a controversy for Margaret Court resulting from her comments about Qantas than it was for this program.
- 13:1913:19, 13 August 2021 diff hist −441 The Project (Australian TV program) →Controversy: This intense POV is not present in the cited source at all, unclear that this event is even notable. Source doesn't mention anything about "promoting class divide" or "attacking working class Australians"