User contributions for Brittainia
A user with 192 edits. Account created on 11 February 2007.
12 December 2009
- 20:4320:43, 12 December 2009 diff hist +97 Talk:Scientific consensus on climate change →Proposal #2: Oppose
- 13:5513:55, 12 December 2009 diff hist +98 m Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mnyakko/aboutme →User talk:Mnyakko/aboutme
- 13:5313:53, 12 December 2009 diff hist +613 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mnyakko/aboutme Editors must be vigilant or Wikipedia will be damaged by POV pushers.
- 13:2013:20, 12 December 2009 diff hist +166 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mnyakko/aboutme →User talk:Mnyakko/aboutme: Keep
- 12:3712:37, 12 December 2009 diff hist +134 User talk:Brittainia →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!: WMC is not an Admin for good reasons
- 12:1912:19, 12 December 2009 diff hist +342 Talk:Climate change →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!
- 12:1012:10, 12 December 2009 diff hist +162 Talk:Climate change →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!
- 12:0912:09, 12 December 2009 diff hist +322 Talk:Climate change →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!
- 12:0812:08, 12 December 2009 diff hist +5,804 Talk:Climate change Undid revision 331244624 by William M. Connolley (talk)
- 10:2910:29, 12 December 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics": Fixing formatting - I really should use preview more often.
- 10:2610:26, 12 December 2009 diff hist +77 Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics": Formatting
- 08:5208:52, 12 December 2009 diff hist 0 m Talk:Climate change Proper place
- 08:3108:31, 12 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics"
- 08:1408:14, 12 December 2009 diff hist +11 Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics"
- 08:1008:10, 12 December 2009 diff hist +366 Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics": This is a Huge Scientific Debate!!
- 07:5907:59, 12 December 2009 diff hist +249 Talk:Climate change →"Scientific Debate" is Debate Among Scientists - Not Large Organisations Fighting Each Other - That is Called "Politics": No more civilized debate?
- 07:5407:54, 12 December 2009 diff hist +4,677 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: Scientific Debate is only possible between organisations?? There goes the entire history of scientific debate!
11 December 2009
- 15:4115:41, 11 December 2009 diff hist +806 User talk:Brittainia →Talk page behavior: I will learn all of the rules of Wikipedia... I will learn all of the rules of Wikipedia... I will learn all of the rules of Wikipedia...
- 14:5214:52, 11 December 2009 diff hist +12 m User talk:Brittainia →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!
- 14:3814:38, 11 December 2009 diff hist +2,397 User talk:Brittainia →Talk page behavior: Censorship forces self defence.
- 14:1414:14, 11 December 2009 diff hist +94 Talk:Climate change →William M. Connolley is Deleting Comments Complaining about the Control Exercised over the GW Articles By his Group - Thus Proving the Complaints are Valid!
- 14:1114:11, 11 December 2009 diff hist +333 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: William M. Connolley is deleting comments which complain of the censorship exercised over the GW articles - thus proving the complaints are valid!
- 14:0214:02, 11 December 2009 diff hist +934 Talk:Climate change Undid revision 331084547 by William M. Connolley (talk)
- 12:2512:25, 11 December 2009 diff hist +934 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: Reason for deletion - that's classified information!
- 10:3210:32, 11 December 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: The Emperor had better hope no one starts laughing at his apparent falsehood!
- 10:2910:29, 11 December 2009 diff hist +772 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: The Emperor had better hope no one starts laughing at his apparent falsehood!
- 10:0810:08, 11 December 2009 diff hist +12 Climate change Mentioned scientific debate
- 09:5809:58, 11 December 2009 diff hist +22 m Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus
- 09:5609:56, 11 December 2009 diff hist +1,439 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: Why does the lead not have any mention of "scientific debate" on AGW?
10 December 2009
- 19:5719:57, 10 December 2009 diff hist +714 Talk:Climate change →restatement of idea: 150 Top Climate Scientists Demand Hard Evidence of AGW
- 10:3010:30, 10 December 2009 diff hist +234 User talk:GoRight →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: Vote on merging "Climate change denial"
- 10:2110:21, 10 December 2009 diff hist +422 Talk:Climate change denial →Merge: Support
- 09:0009:00, 10 December 2009 diff hist +340 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: Newton's Law's are wrong - but AGW is absolutely proven!!
- 08:5508:55, 10 December 2009 diff hist −214 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: signed
- 08:2508:25, 10 December 2009 diff hist +740 Talk:Climate change →Missing information about Climategate consensus: Balance??
- 07:4207:42, 10 December 2009 diff hist +114 Talk:Climate change →Text discussion: Why would a pro AGW edit ever need a consensus?
- 07:1407:14, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1,002 User talk:Brittainia →Re: edits to Talk:Global warming: The Global Warming article is balanced!?! --------- Really?!!!!? -- Are you being serious?
9 December 2009
- 20:4820:48, 9 December 2009 diff hist +376 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: Link to correct Wikipedia page is inaccurate???
- 20:3520:35, 9 December 2009 diff hist +311 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: inaccurate?
- 20:2620:26, 9 December 2009 diff hist +699 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: Censored.
- 20:1820:18, 9 December 2009 diff hist +133 Climate change Replaced line deleted earlier without discussion, to bring the tiniest bit of balance to the Lede - See discussion page.
- 20:1020:10, 9 December 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: The years just fly by! :o)
- 19:5919:59, 9 December 2009 diff hist +609 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?: 6 words?
- 18:4018:40, 9 December 2009 diff hist +828 Talk:Climate change →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?
- 12:3712:37, 9 December 2009 diff hist +2,054 Talk:Climate change Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article now that the data concealment and altering have been exposed?
- 12:2412:24, 9 December 2009 diff hist +422 User talk:Brittainia →December 2009: Why not be constructive with your criticism instead of censoring to keep POV?
- 12:1412:14, 9 December 2009 diff hist +1,779 User talk:UBeR Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article now that the AGW conspiracy has been Exposed?
- 12:0412:04, 9 December 2009 diff hist +1 User talk:GoRight →Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?
- 11:3811:38, 9 December 2009 diff hist +1,779 User talk:GoRight Is There Any Chance of Getting Some Balance in the Global Warming Article?
- 11:0311:03, 9 December 2009 diff hist −357 m User talk:Brittainia No edit summary
