User contributions for 68.107.140.60

21 September 2012

• 05:4405:44, 21 September 2012 diff hist +189‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles
• 05:3405:34, 21 September 2012 diff hist +540‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles
• 05:0605:06, 21 September 2012 diff hist +160‎ User talk:Adam mugliston ‎ →‎Status unapproved bots
• 04:5804:58, 21 September 2012 diff hist +348‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles: if knowing it is bot created is enough to ruin the article, we should probably stop making them -- for An

20 September 2012

• 14:0614:06, 20 September 2012 diff hist +1,545‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles

19 September 2012

• 01:2401:24, 19 September 2012 diff hist +338‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) ‎ →‎Should bot created stubs be labeled, "Created by bot," or some such: new section
• 01:1801:18, 19 September 2012 diff hist +645‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles: speak of the devil
• 01:1201:12, 19 September 2012 diff hist +449‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles

17 September 2012

• 03:3903:39, 17 September 2012 diff hist −9‎ User talk:Adam mugliston ‎ →‎Status unapproved bots: m
• 03:3703:37, 17 September 2012 diff hist +394‎ User talk:Adam mugliston ‎ →‎Status unapproved bots: new section
• 03:2903:29, 17 September 2012 diff hist +183‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Why no bot-created tag on articles: then let's default to add the tag, or discuss with community

16 September 2012

• 01:5901:59, 16 September 2012 diff hist +291‎ User talk:Ganeshk ‎ →‎Created by bot tag missing: new section
• 01:5601:56, 16 September 2012 diff hist +339‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: I love speedy approvals of article creations bots, but the community doesn't

15 September 2012

• 03:1203:12, 15 September 2012 diff hist +272‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MadmanBot 16 ‎ →‎Discussion: speedy appropriate

14 September 2012

• 15:2015:20, 14 September 2012 diff hist +1,490‎ Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ‎ →‎Errors in the current or next Did you know...: enough time; DYK and Wikipedia are fine with plagiarisms and bad science on the main page; I just needed to score points byposting this
• 13:2813:28, 14 September 2012 diff hist +1,060‎ Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ‎ →‎Errors in the current or next Did you know...: the usual plagiarized and meaningless crap
• 13:2113:21, 14 September 2012 diff hist +391‎ Talk:Nostoc commune ‎ →‎Plagiarized nonsense: new section

11 September 2012

• 05:1605:16, 11 September 2012 diff hist +496‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 19 ‎ →‎Discussion
• 05:1305:13, 11 September 2012 diff hist +1,035‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: sounds good, a lot of pain to get the info though, ow

9 September 2012

• 18:1818:18, 9 September 2012 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: (minor)
• 18:1618:16, 9 September 2012 diff hist +792‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: in conclusion, there is not point to BRFA
• 17:4217:42, 9 September 2012 diff hist +324‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: let's stay on target
• 17:4017:40, 9 September 2012 diff hist +1,591‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: r - Anomie, Ganesh
• 17:3017:30, 9 September 2012 diff hist +535‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 19 ‎ →‎Discussion: ok
• 08:2908:29, 9 September 2012 diff hist +480‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: oh, requiring a bot to count, how demanding can one be
• 08:1408:14, 9 September 2012 diff hist +793‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 19 ‎ →‎Discussion
• 07:0307:03, 9 September 2012 diff hist +1,008‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: another non-applicable essay quoted
• 06:1306:13, 9 September 2012 diff hist +528‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: maybe Ganesh can explain what number 100 really means, 141 in August, so 500 means 732? 541?
• 06:0106:01, 9 September 2012 diff hist −43‎ Richard Dell ‎ remove "Dr." per MOS
• 05:3105:31, 9 September 2012 diff hist +953‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: time for irc secret cabal action
• 05:0005:00, 9 September 2012 diff hist +564‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 19 ‎ →‎Discussion: let's see if we can get the 19th century airports speedy approved also
• 04:4204:42, 9 September 2012 diff hist +713‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: open for 10 days, and you had to speedy approve with my comment unaddressed? operator has already grossly misinterpretted consensus once
• 04:0404:04, 9 September 2012 diff hist +509‎ User talk:Rcsprinter123 ‎ →‎Changing unapproved bots' status
• 03:2503:25, 9 September 2012 diff hist +570‎ User talk:Madman ‎ →‎Inappropriate speedy approval: new section
• 03:1603:16, 9 September 2012 diff hist +762‎ User talk:Ganeshk ‎ →‎Bot owners notice board -- you are being mentioned: new section
• 03:1403:14, 9 September 2012 diff hist +1,301‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Ignored question, slam approval: new section

8 September 2012

• 21:3121:31, 8 September 2012 diff hist +479‎ Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Ganeshbot 11 ‎ →‎Discussion: ip!
• 21:0621:06, 8 September 2012 diff hist +539‎ User talk:Rcsprinter123 ‎ →‎Changing unapproved bots' status: new section
• 21:0121:01, 8 September 2012 diff hist +2‎ User:Anybot ‎ Undid revision 495003664 by Rcsprinter123 (talk) This bot is not inactive, it is unapproved, please read before changing!