User contributions for 2605:8D80:664:E4A6:BF9E:B2C:F736:CA48
For 2605:8D80:664:E4A6:BF9E:B2C:F736:CA48 talk block log logs filter log
29 October 2019
- 00:3000:30, 29 October 2019 diff hist +40 Talk:Racialism →David Reich article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 00:2600:26, 29 October 2019 diff hist +2,073 Talk:Racialism →David Reich article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
28 October 2019
- 21:2821:28, 28 October 2019 diff hist −3 Talk:Racialism →David Reich article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:2721:27, 28 October 2019 diff hist +122 Talk:Racialism →David Reich article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:2321:23, 28 October 2019 diff hist +628 Talk:Racialism →David Reich article Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0921:09, 28 October 2019 diff hist +1 Racialism →Definitions and differences: If someone is disputing this, where is their discussion on the talk page stating it? I entered a direct quote from Dr. Reich Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0821:08, 28 October 2019 diff hist +557 Racialism →Definitions and differences: I entered the source verbatim. Nothing is being 'stretched'. It's a direct quote. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0221:02, 28 October 2019 diff hist 0 Racialism The source here does not say "most" anywhere Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:0121:01, 28 October 2019 diff hist +573 Racialism →Definitions and differences: there's no need to go to the talk page for adding a very reliable source according to WP Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:4119:41, 28 October 2019 diff hist +8 Racialism →Definitions and differences: Race is debated by academics in terms of its validity as a category in humans instead of subspecies, population, lineage, etc. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:0318:03, 28 October 2019 diff hist 0 Racialism Original editor was correct. I do not see any source here using the word 'most'. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:0118:01, 28 October 2019 diff hist +574 Racialism →Definitions and differences: No need for 'discussion' since this is a reliable source from the foremost expert in the field. This can be included per WP. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2915:29, 28 October 2019 diff hist −21 Tunisians Source does not say this term is equivalent to 'Roman Africans' Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2715:27, 28 October 2019 diff hist −7 Tunisians You have both violated 3RR. Tunisians are not Romance speakers Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2415:24, 28 October 2019 diff hist −91 Tunisians →Africa and Ifriqiya: Stop edit warring. This is what the ref says and should state here. Two of you take to talk page. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:1715:17, 28 October 2019 diff hist −30 Tunisians No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit