User contributions for 23.242.198.189
For 23.242.198.189 talk block log logs filter log
28 April 2021
- 18:3218:32, 28 April 2021 diff hist +980 Talk:Trump–Raffensperger phone call →Updated on release of phone call with investigator transcript: the WP source wasn't "fake"
2 April 2021
- 07:2007:20, 2 April 2021 diff hist +982 Talk:Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election →Title of the article: assuring the integrity of an election is literally the opposite of attempting to overturn an election
1 April 2021
- 05:2705:27, 1 April 2021 diff hist −296 Analysis of variance →Model confirmation: removed what appeared to be a completely arbitrary heuristic. Tag: references removed
- 05:2305:23, 1 April 2021 diff hist −1,050 Analysis of variance →Follow-up tests: Hinkelmann and Kempthorne don't seem to have a coherent criticism of pairwise MCPs in the cited source. They "caution against their uncritical use, but...feel that MCPs can play a useful role." That can be said about basically any procedure. Also, referring to Tukey's tests as "post hoc" is misleading since presumably they are typically planned a priori. There are many MCPs, so instead of providing unnecessary detail about a few arbitrary examples, let's be more general. Tag: references removed
- 05:0905:09, 1 April 2021 diff hist −25 Analysis of variance →Follow-up tests: cleaned up some imprecise language
30 March 2021
- 07:4707:47, 30 March 2021 diff hist +1,455 Talk:Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election →This Article is Very Far-Left. It needs to be deleted or reworked.: facts aren't "biased" just because they're unpopular with the misinformed
26 March 2021
- 16:1216:12, 26 March 2021 diff hist −3,591 Analysis of variance →Design-of-experiments terms: Removed huge section that didn't belong in the article. It was a whole glossary of terms on a merely tangental topic pasted in from somewhere.
- 16:0816:08, 26 March 2021 diff hist −207 Analysis of variance →Background and terminology: removed unecessary verbiage. No need to say ANOVA is a "statistical tool." That's already been made abundantly clear. And no need to repeatedly say that it has a lot of different uses. That's also been made abundantly clear.
- 16:0416:04, 26 March 2021 diff hist −210 Analysis of variance →Background and terminology: Not clear what the source for these claim is. Also they are dubious. For example, ANOVA is robust to assumption violations??? Only under certain circumstances. "Provides strong analysis?" What does that even mean?
- 16:0116:01, 26 March 2021 diff hist −120 Analysis of variance →Background and terminology: saying ANOVA is the most useful statistical technique that exists is mere opinion. It's also not clear what counts as a "statistical technique." For instance, is ANOVA more useful than estimation? Is it more useful than confidence intervals? Is the author considering t-tests as a form of ANOVA?
25 March 2021
- 10:0310:03, 25 March 2021 diff hist +22 Charles Cicchetti →2020 lawsuit: m
24 March 2021
- 21:3021:30, 24 March 2021 diff hist −154 Charles Cicchetti →2020 lawsuit: Further rewording, removed redundancy
- 21:2221:22, 24 March 2021 diff hist +307 Charles Cicchetti →2020 lawsuit: rewording and slight reorganization for clarity and flow
22 March 2021
- 07:0407:04, 22 March 2021 diff hist +13 Confidence interval m
- 07:0307:03, 22 March 2021 diff hist +9 Confidence interval m
21 March 2021
- 15:1215:12, 21 March 2021 diff hist −304 Analysis of variance →Study designs: Corrected definition of factorial ANOVA. Removed questionable source. Replaced "treatment" with the more general term "factor." Tag: references removed
18 March 2021
- 08:4208:42, 18 March 2021 diff hist −3 Bonferroni correction →Generalization: m
17 March 2021
- 15:3515:35, 17 March 2021 diff hist −2 P-value →General: m
- 15:3515:35, 17 March 2021 diff hist −236 P-value →General: further simplification
- 15:3215:32, 17 March 2021 diff hist +12 P-value →General: m
- 15:3015:30, 17 March 2021 diff hist −429 P-value →General: Simplified. Reduced wordiness.
15 March 2021
- 09:0109:01, 15 March 2021 diff hist +7 Talk:Keith Raniere →Use of the word "rape": m
- 01:4201:42, 15 March 2021 diff hist −4 Analysis of variance m
14 March 2021
- 17:0917:09, 14 March 2021 diff hist +1,322 Talk:Keith Raniere →Use of the word "rape": new section
- 16:3816:38, 14 March 2021 diff hist −11 Keith Raniere →Early adulthood: see previous edit Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
- 16:3716:37, 14 March 2021 diff hist +25 Keith Raniere →Early adulthood: The cited article doesn't say he was alleged to have raped Melita. The word "rape" has a specific meaning (forced intercourse), as does the word "allegedly" (according to accusation). Thus, saying he allegedly raped her means that he was accused of forced intercourse. That's not what the cited article says. The editor who repeatedly inserts the word "rape" where it doesn't belong is essentially vandalizing the article to promote a personal agenda. STOP IT.
13 March 2021
12 March 2021
- 10:1610:16, 12 March 2021 diff hist +1,713 Talk:Misuse of p-values →Opposite sides of 0.05: that misconception is already addressed in the article without the problematic and subjective language about "statistical conflict"
3 March 2021
- 04:2604:26, 3 March 2021 diff hist −644 Misuse of p-values Undid revision 1005200315 by Nuretok (talk) Revered good faith edit. It isn't clear what "in conflict" means. This seems like a subjective thing, not an objective misconception. Tag: Undo
17 February 2021
- 08:4208:42, 17 February 2021 diff hist −63 Analysis of variance no reason you can't do an ANOVA with just two means.
- 08:3908:39, 17 February 2021 diff hist −1 Trump–Raffensperger phone call m
12 February 2021
- 16:3116:31, 12 February 2021 diff hist +7 Trump–Raffensperger phone call m
6 February 2021
- 20:4420:44, 6 February 2021 diff hist +29 P-value →Basic concepts: minor rephrase. used slightly more precise language.
1 February 2021
- 19:2519:25, 1 February 2021 diff hist −12 Second impeachment of Donald Trump →Background: "partial concession" is an odd, nonstandard term
- 19:2219:22, 1 February 2021 diff hist −48 Second impeachment of Donald Trump Pence had no authority to have Trump impeached. So it doesn't make sense to say he was urged to either invoke the 25th amendment or have Trump impeached.
29 January 2021
- 17:5917:59, 29 January 2021 diff hist −114 Confidence interval →Comparison to Bayesian interval estimates{{anchor|Credible interval}}: reduced wordiness
23 January 2021
- 08:4508:45, 23 January 2021 diff hist −386 Analysis of variance →Cautions: Removed unsourced statement about what "should" be done
- 08:4408:44, 23 January 2021 diff hist −219 Analysis of variance →Cautions: Not clear what that sentence was trying to say. When assumptions are met, conducting a single ANOVA omnibus test controls alpha because it's just a single test, so there effectively AREN'T multiple comparisons—even in a factorial design. If you do multiple ANOVAs, or if you do additional tests besides a single omnibus test, then you have a multiple comparisons problem—but that's true regardless of how many "dimensions" there are.
- 08:3608:36, 23 January 2021 diff hist −6 Analysis of variance m
- 08:2908:29, 23 January 2021 diff hist −49 P-value →Definition and interpretation: It's true—in a sense—that alpha is "arbitrary." But that's a potentially misleading statement, since the word "arbitrary" is often used to mean "capriciously or randomly determined." In any case, the other language in the paragraph gets the point across sufficiently, so the problematic sentence wasn't necessary anyway.
- 08:1808:18, 23 January 2021 diff hist +6 Brian Wansink fixed comma splice
- 08:1508:15, 23 January 2021 diff hist +580 Talk:PragerU →The Southern strategy is well documented: new section
22 January 2021
- 16:3916:39, 22 January 2021 diff hist 0 Statistical hypothesis test minor but important rephrase. we should be careful not to imply that statistical significance directly indicates the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
19 January 2021
- 23:3123:31, 19 January 2021 diff hist −80 Bonferroni correction →Background: Bonferroni didn't really invent the procedure. It's just named after him.
14 January 2021
- 17:3417:34, 14 January 2021 diff hist −606 P-value →General: corrected p-value definition for two-sided test. Removed the unclear, unnecessary statements that are better shown through the formulas than explained in cryptic language.
- 16:5416:54, 14 January 2021 diff hist +43 Texas v. Pennsylvania →Statistical analysis: let's make it crystal clear
- 16:5116:51, 14 January 2021 diff hist −61 Texas v. Pennsylvania →Statistical analysis: grammar fixes, also used more precise language
8 January 2021
- 07:2907:29, 8 January 2021 diff hist +2 Charles Cicchetti →2020 lawsuit: m
4 January 2021
- 15:5815:58, 4 January 2021 diff hist +1 Charles Cicchetti →2020 lawsuit: m
3 January 2021
- 02:0902:09, 3 January 2021 diff hist −73 Confidence interval misleading
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |