Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Deep Narayan Mahaprabhuji (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 07:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sri Deep Narayan Mahaprabhuji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable religious leader with no reliable sources. I looked at the first debate from 2004 and it offered no proof of notability or reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 16:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Unlike Shri Pawahari Balkrishn Yatiji, all sourceable and potentially true claims of humans aged 135 are notable. Also had two notable followers. 209.243.55.22 (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I didn't see him on this list, Oldest people and could not find a reliable source to confirm the age of 135. Any reliable sources to confirm this would help this article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Also, he had two disciples on Wikipedia with no sources. They were both nominated for deletion and were deleted as non notables. So, he does not have two notable disciples per Wikipedia's standards on notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The first debate is listed at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sri Deep Narayan Mahaprabhuji. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 23:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep: his two desciples shouldn't have been deleted either. Yoga In Daily life is a renown yoga center all over Europe and was founded by Maheshwaranda. Please review these articles as they should be on wikipedia at the very least. Thanks Abhishek Purohit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.102.57 (talk) 21:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Thank you for your first edit to wikipedia. If you would like to help this article, I would suggest adding reliable sources to the article that would show this person to be notable. At present there is no proof of notability nor any clear claim to notability. Also, there is a complete lack of reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After nominating this article over a week ago, and it has become clear that this religious leader's page and his disciples pages were a Wikipedia:Walled garden. The articles only linked to one another. After they were reviewed it was determined that they were not notable just as Sri Deep Narayan Mahaprabhuji. This article deserves a Strong Delete. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No verifiable references to indicate notability, the claimed biography can't be found though Book Sources. Sandstein 20:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - major verifiability problem here, certainly no evidence within reliable sources. Claim of living 136 years was not mentioned in any issue of Guinness Book of World Records, probably the definitive source for extreme human longevity since its inception, for example. B.Wind (talk) 04:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.