Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olav Basoski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. seicer | talk | contribs 03:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Olav Basoski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BLP as an unsourced biographical article. Due to the lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications this also fails WP:MUSIC as well. JBsupreme (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jamie☆S93 13:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 02:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No third-pary sources. Looks like promotion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Achieves notability through the Michie One duet, which I can confirm through the Guinness Book Of British Hit Singles, ed. 19, charted at #45 in the UK (plus "Opium Scumbagz", #56 UK), therefore meeting criterion #2 of WP:MUSIC, although they have failed to mention this in the article. Released one single on Defected Records, and another on Positiva Records, therefore half-meeting #5. Plus the collaborations with Erick E and DJ Zki. Unsourced doesn't mean delete (there's an inclusionist statement for you). Say what you think, but it's notable. I'm going to make improvements to the article now. SpecialK 15:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.