User talk:JalenFolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Jd22292)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Regarding page reviewer

Thank you to everyone who recommended I try out the New Page Reviewer right, however, I have opted not to make it permanent nor do I intend on returning to it for as long as this message is up. New page reviewing doesn't seem to make sense to me given all I've ever used it for (mostly) was page reviewing redirects following bad article attempts. Even that part of Wikipedia has given me a small amount of stress, and I've had to back away from disputes to avoid making that stress worse.

In short, it doesn't make sense to me to keep a user right if I know I'm not going to use it as frequently, especially given I might leave Wikipedia within the next few years. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was coming here to leave a message to you regarding NPP, and saw this. Too bad, we could use quality folks over there, but I definitely understand about the stress. Thanks for all you do. Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Oregon Blackbears

In all due respect, did you read yesterday’s (May 28) AFL press release? I included it as a reference with my article change. There is no better official source as the AFL themselves. https://www.theafl.com/news/arena-football-league-afl-appoints-new-president-c ” We are excited about what we plan to bring to the American public, this season and beyond.” Looking ahead, the AFL will continue to operate as a 9-team league, featuring the following teams: Albany Firebirds Billings Outlaws Nashville Kats Orlando Predators Salina Liberty SW Kansas Storm Washington Wolfpack West Texas Desert Hawks Wichita Regulators” No Blackbears mentioned. Not here or anywhere on the website except one scheduled game. They were listed among the teams last week. Heck, the VooDoo (June 13) and Force (June 22) have games still listed. This is probably the only announcement the AFL will make. After all, they were booted once, given a second chance, and then they failed to show up to a road game. They’re gone. Straykat99 (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Straykat99: I just did. It was reposted to OurSportsCentral and reinserted by JMyrleFuller. I have no further opposition at this time. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 02:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving userspace pages to drafts?

Doesn't that kill them? As in -- it was previously fine to just roam for years and years, but now it has to be edited every six months or it dies forever. jp×g🗯️ 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: You are correct in saying this. For this specific draft, I have notified the user on their Talk page that I had the intent to do this and they were okay with it. I had the feeling this was a draft that would be in others' interests as well, and not just the user's. If it were a different draft and I didn't have this intuition, I would not have done this. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 16:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC third round shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 12:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I Am Fish" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I Am Fish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § I Am Fish until a consensus is reached. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for doing this, I found out from the CVN Channel Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 18:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Direct link: https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#cvn-wp-en If you want to come fight vandalism as well! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 18:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JalenFolf&oldid=1232909637"