User talk:GMH Melbourne

Your GA nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

The article Matthew Charles Johnson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson and Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 07:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding WP:GARC

Hi @GMH Melbourne! I was wondering if there's a limit for how many articles one person can list at the review circles; I have a few GANs that I'd like cleared sometime, and I feel as if there's some current stagnation with how many participants there are. I've already finished my preliminary review for Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album), and I'm just waiting for the nominator to get back to me so I can continue reviewing their fixes. Just need an indication of whether listing another one of my GANs for review would be considered greedy or not.

Also, I want to reiterate that I think this is a wonderful idea, and that it should be promoted a bit more - I think it'll help a lot in clearing out the backlog. joeyquism (talk page) 07:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, @Joeyquism, the aim of GARC is to reduce the GAN backlog and wait times so feel free to add more articles to the pool! Keep in mind though that the process is still being trialled and I have stopped advertising the page so it might take a little while for you to be paired in a circle. Thank you for your contributions to the process thus far and don't hesitate to drop me anymore questions feedback you may have! GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the clarification! I think I'll drop one more in within the next week or so after I (hopefully) complete my existing review. joeyquism (talk page) 07:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

The article Matthew Charles Johnson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson for comments about the article, and Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thank you for starting WP:GARC! What an elegant solution to a problem that has been plaguing the Good Article process for some time. Here's to hoping it will continue to develop in the future. Fritzmann (message me) 10:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! I should have my review for Hypericum huber-morathii completed by tomorrow (AEST). GMH Melbourne (talk) 10:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Matthew Charles Johnson

Hi GMH Melbourne, I've now finished my copy-edit. I found there is a fair bit of uncited text in the section "Criminal history". I also noted some uncited direct quotations within that section. I have marked these texts with [citation needed] tags. Because this is a Good Article and a biography of a living person, we must be mindful to properly cite texts. Per good article criteria, good articles are required to comply with BLP.

I also noticed two primary sources are used; one is the judgement in the case of Williams' murder from the Supreme Court of Victoria; the other is the investigation into Corrections Victoria relating to Williams' death. According to WP:BLPPRIMARY, court records and transcripts are not supposed to be used as refs in articles; these should be replaced with, or at least augmented with, secondary sources. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)