This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.

User:Xymmax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 90
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 43
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 18
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 170
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 14
    Open sockpuppet investigations 279
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs

    [edit]

    Administrative backlog

    [edit]

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports

    [edit]

    User-reported

    [edit]


    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 0
    Empty articles 1
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 4
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 9

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    Deletion backlog

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    User-reported

    [edit]
    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    [edit]
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: UPE user 'Acrosstheriver21' was blocked in 2021 after making COI edits to this article. Since then a series of Northern Italian based IP addresses have been editing this article in a disruptive fashion. Statements by the user on the relevant IP talk pages indicate that this is the same user, evading the block. Disruption continues and, since the film will shortly be released, further disruption can be expected. Some form of page protection would seem preferable to playing IP whack-a-mole. Further detail can be found in the relevant discussion at WP:COIN Axad12 (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Regarding the issue above…
    Given the similarity of other interests (articles relating to the Raikes family and vandalism of the page for Will Johns[4]) it would seem to be plausible that the user involved above is the same as the one involved in this sockpuppet investigation[5].
    If so, the user is a veteran of at least 8 different blocked accounts and 2 blocked IP addresses.
    Maybe also worth protecting the articles for Will Johns (to stop vandalism), and Raikes, Raymond Raikes and Geoffrey Raikes (to dissuade against block evasion via IP addresses)? Axad12 (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    +1 This has been happening for a long time. Across the River and into the Trees should also be protected. See WP:COIN#Across the River and into the Trees (film). C F A 💬 15:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Reason: Wiki-battle over the last several days including what appears to be a death threat, against the backdrop of extreme tension in Bangladesh. I suggest that protecting the page until the situation calms down would be helpful. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Reason: Long-term vandalism by IPs, for years as far as I remember relating to a point on involvement of Pakistani general. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    you are aware that there are editors with opinions that different than yours yes?
    why not talk and get to the middle ground?
    its seams that the edits the IP user have made were resalable sine Pakistan iniid provide financial aid.
    could you please elaborate why is it important to you to censor this fact? 109.66.110.43 (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IP jumper has been reverted by several of us multiple times. Perhaps a week of protection will stop the issue. It's not an article that is edited a heap. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. @Fyunck(click): Please try to make greater efforts to explain these types of reversions in your edit summaries. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    My fault there. In defense this hopping IP is doing this to multiple Disney articles over the last month and my patience is waning. Check out the Winnie the Pooh movies where i told them "Bring it to talk... this is like all other disney animated features". Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Temporary extended protection: Updating quickly - vandalism very likely. Also, aren't all 2024 Election-related Articles protected? Avishai11 (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is premature. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Reason: False information about it was Posted today. Want page protected before that information is brought back/any more misinformation is brought in. 2600:6C46:6800:21F8:A1A4:41BB:F7D9:A371 (talk) 19:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One drive-by vandal edit isn't enough for protection. Acroterion (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    The vandalism was inaccurate information. This page NEEDS to be protected so none happens again. 2600:6C46:6800:21F8:A1A4:41BB:F7D9:A371 (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    We don't protect articles over a single incident. If we did that, almost every article would be protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Reason: To control vandalism. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Page has a history of disruptive editing/vandalism by IPs. Also it's a contentious topic as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Temporary extended protection: All 2024 U.S. Presidential campaigns are protected (most have Extended). Harris announced she is running for POTUS, so her campaign's page should be protected. If not extended, then at least Semi. Avishai11 (talk) 20:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    barley any disruptive editing. Roadlover23e4321 (talk) 20:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LR.127 (talk) 23:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased vandalism as we approach the Olympics. Requesting protection until the end of the games on August 11, 2024. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry/vandalism/disruptive editing continues despite three previous protections. Heartfox (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    [edit]
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: It was protected indefinitely when the article subject was Premier. She has long left that role. Any vandals would be long down 12 years later. The protecting admin is not active at the moment. LibStar (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    [edit]
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I would like to request that... (We are able to take all the hearsay out of this Article. I have been watching her videos on youtube and a lot of the information she is providing is basic and extremely healthy. Any doctor whos ever prescribed anything could be classified as doing something extremely dangerous.. look at america atm.. nothing wrong with barbara. Clean this page up please. Btw she said for me to use castor oil on my dermatitis and it worked, 20 years of nothing working that doctors and dermatologist perscribed and here i am, my serrabhorbic dermatitis and rosacea have gotten better) . 114.30.104.246 (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    •  Comment:: How can a nonexistent article contain "hearsay"? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    • : Not done. Well, I'm pleased your dermatitis and rosacea have got better but you haven't named the article nor specified in a 'change X to Y' way what edit you are requesting. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    [edit]
    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    0 protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    18 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
    Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
    Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
    Template:Designation (request) 2024-07-13 19:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Module:Unsubst-infobox (request) 2024-07-14 17:12 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2018-02-03: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Contentious topics/talk notice (request) 2024-07-15 08:15 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-16: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-07-15 08:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
    Template:Music (request) 2024-07-16 15:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:College athlete recruit entry (request) 2024-07-18 14:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox person (request) 2024-07-19 00:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
    Template:User rights (request) 2024-07-21 16:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:WikiProject Computing (request) 2024-07-21 23:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-12-01: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Non-free 3D art (request) 2024-07-22 00:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-10-08: "Highly visible template: Over 1500 transclusions"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)


    RFA= Requests for adminship

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

    Account creator

    [edit]

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]

    Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
    Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

    Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Hello good day, may I request the autopatroller rights? Although I just have 17 articles so far of course one is deleted. I mostly write biographies, movies, and history. These articles are free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Thank you.

     Automated comment This user has created roughly 17 articles. MusikBot talk 10:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
     Not done please read the information page (linked above) before requesting rights. – Joe (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


    Confirmed

    [edit]

    Unflagged bot under test hitting editfilters. Requesting confirmed rights to prevent this, and to allow clerking of Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2. See BRFA. Mdann52 (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

    Reason for requesting confirmed rights

     I am requesting confirmed rights because I am trying to create a new page however I can't do that without confirmed/auto- 
     confirmed permissions. Pemguincraft (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
    
     Not done You can propose a new page for creation following the Articles for Creation process. This will allow you to take some time to draft the article and get feedback on it before it becomes a fully-fledged article. stwalkerster (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    File mover

    [edit]

    I would like to apply for the File mover right to rename files. I've been contributing on Commons for quite some time now, and I've been doing lots of good file renaming requests on Wikipedia. The file movers also appreciated my rename requests [6]. I'm a file mover and patroller on Commons, and I've moved over 1000 files so far. I have a good understanding of the renaming guideline, and I think it would be really helpful also having the right here. Thank you! Waqar💬 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Page mover

    [edit]


    I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done Elli (talk | contribs) 19:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]

    Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

    Per your discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnybros. It shows any editor with the motive to promote a subject either by Youtube link or any other link that are not necessary or accepted by wikipedia. You are likely to accept them. So I will be afraid if this right is being granted to you for the betterment of wikipedia. Administrators should be aware. Gabriel (talk to me ) 11:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
    Honestly, Gabriel101, I've looked at this user's contributions, and they look more than ready to be a reviewer. On top of that, you are requesting the same rights of this user? And though I am saying the same thing as this user did on your request, did you have to say what you said here and not on the user's talk page? Apollogetticax|talk 06:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    Point of correction, I am not Gabriel101. And to address your concern. If I had gone to user talk page it could have been useless or a waste of time as the same user has removed everything that was notified against him recently by other editors. I don’t know what you have looked but I see no sense in what you are saying if you have really looked as you said and not noticing an edit was stroked here. Regarding same permission kindly read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Achievers Award. I will advice you focus on your Sockpuppet account case User:User:HTML5, CSS3! and here User_talk:Ferret#Thank_you. Cheers. Gabriel (weytin dey sup) 12:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
     Not done. I think it'd be beneficial for you to get a bit more experience and re-apply later on. Nothing stops you from helping out and fixing inappropriate edits where you find them. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

    I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

    I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

    You commented ill about me based on the permission I’m trying to get, the best place was to be my talk page but you came here to say such why? And now you want same permission I’m requesting for? Not cool @Gabriel601Madeforall1 (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
     Not done. I think it'd be beneficial for you to get a bit more experience and re-apply later on. Nothing stops you from helping out and fixing inappropriate edits where you find them. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
    Okay. Thanks. Gabriel (……?) 21:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing.

    Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

    I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hello, I am requesting pending changes review rights to improve my anti-vandalism work here on Wikipedia. I frequently revert instances of vandalism and am willing to assist with pending changes revisions. Thank you. doclys (❀) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)


    Rollback

    [edit]

    Hello! I would like to request rollback rights as I've been pretty active in countering vandalism since May. I use Twinkle and I notify new users consistently when I revert, usually by using a warn template, but other times by writing a message myself. I do my best to distinguish between good faith edits and vandalism and avoid unnecessary edit wars. Having made around 20 successful AIV reports, I am interested in making patrolling quicker with Huggle. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chatmy doings) 22:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hello, at this point I think I’m ready to fight vandalism and make good rollback edits, I really need this tools to be giving me to me, I’m an experienced editor and I think some editors are really not doing justice in terms of there edits, I want to use the tools to revert some edits that shouldn't be Madeforall1 (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). MusikBot talk 12:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
    User:Madeforall1, you just had a declined request for this permission a few days ago. You were asked to do some work and don't make another request for at least a month but you waited about 5 days. Did you not understand what you were being told? Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
     Not done for the exact same reason I declined the previous request. -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hello! I am applying for the role of rollbacker, having been a Wikipedia user for over 10 years and being increasingly active in the last few years. In this vein, I feel that I have undone my fair share of vandalism and, being mainly focused on football/sports articles, vandalism and unconstructive/unsourced edits are very common in my area of interest and editing. I believe that these rights will be very useful in maximising the efficiency of my work on Wikipedia and will save me time from undoing separate edits individually. Additionally, I have past experience as an administrator on a Wikia project, where I made use of the rollback feature and have good knowledge of its positives and when to utilise it. Thank you for taking your time to review my request. Kind regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    Firstly, I must say I was not aware of the fact that you have to leave a message for every kind of blatant vandalism that is reverted. I usually do it in cases where the user is registered and appears to have used the account for more than a single edit, where they have also done multiple similar unconstructive edits. Secondly, I did not know what the tools were used for and, usually, when I leave messages regarding things such as vandalism, I do it manually. I will take a look at the tools and perhaps make a future request if I am able to work with them properly. If not, then I suppose I will just stick to my current flow of anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 05:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    I regularly monitor the "recent change" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to quickly enhance the process of reviewing RecentChanges. For over a month, I have been patrolling RecentChanges and using Ultraviolet and Twinkle to revert and warn users. Thank you. doclys (❀) 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

    Template editor

    [edit]

    I'm requesting template editor privileges due to recent changes that classify parts of the Template:Occupation_by_nationality_and_century_category_header as high risk [8]. I developed this template to help manage occupation categories and have become quite familiar with template syntax over the past year, though I do not consider myself an expert. My expertise lies more in R programming, which I teach as part of a data science class.

    I meet nearly all the requirements for template editor privileges, except for having syntax requests implemented in other high-risk templates. While I have edited templates that have become high risk, I acknowledge that this is not the same. However, I have made a sizable number of technical contributions to RegExTypoFix, primarily in optimizing the regular expression. This is the code underlying the spellchecker used by AWB to implement uncontroversial misspellings. If necessary, I am willing to find and suggest syntax changes to further demonstrate my capabilities. Mason (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    Smasongarrison, that template is only ExCon-protected, and thus you should be able to edit it. It otherwise doesn't sound like you need this permission. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry, I wasn't clear. The core subpage of the template; Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header/outercore has just been changed. [9] Mason (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
    I'd also be fine if I could just be given edit permission just for Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header and the subpages, if that's a possibility Mason (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
    Ah, I thought I had checked them all but clearly missed one. I've dropped the protection back down. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
     Not done (for the bot) mainly due to lack of indicated need. No prejudice against requesting in the future if protected-template editing becomes more of an issue. Primefac (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    I'm requesting template editor permission for some edits related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships. I meet all of the guidelines and have held template editor permission in the past (see Special:UserRights/RP88 and Special:PermaLink/805154993 for original grant), but previous template editor permission was dropped during a period of inactivity on my part. I am not sure if it is relevant to en.WP, but as a Commons administrator I have made hundreds of edits to the restricted templates/modules in the Commons Module and Template namespaces. —RP88 (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done. Primefac (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

    Footer

    [edit]

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Unified login: Xymmax is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.