Talk:Rougarou (roller coaster)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleRougarou (roller coaster) was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 10, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Untitled

[edit]

"Cedar Point renamed the coaster Mantis (but the sound the coaster makes as the cars roll, originally intended to sound like a wailing banshee, remains)."

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the second part of that sentence is completely unsourced. From what I've read of B&M coasters, several (including Kumba and Raptor) make a loud roaring-type noise due to the way the track is constructed. Kendall 03:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mantis (roller coaster)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 21:59, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    See comment section below, there is just one small sentence that needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    See comment section below.--Dom497 (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    See comment section below.--Dom497 (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    See comment section below for a photo suggestion.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    See comments below. The article will be on hold for 7 days. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed or commented on all your comments.--Astros4477 (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are still 3 issues I have regarding refs (take a look above).--Dom497 (talk) 02:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the time! I understand how school can take over your life sometimes.--Astros4477 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rougarou

[edit]

Just as a note to everyone: I don't think we should move the page to "Rougarou (roller coaster" until Mantis closes in October.--Dom497 (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. FirstDrop87 (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We're just going to treat this the same as any of the Six Flags revamps of their wooden coasters, right? But with a name change of course. Hooky-i-vanisher (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mantis photos instead of Rougarou photos?

[edit]

@GoneIn60: Any reason we want to favor older Mantis photos over newer Rougarou photos? Seems like all the Mantis photos are now less informative as they no longer represent the ride in its current form. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 20:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Varnent: Nope, you're right. I overlooked the fact that the previous photo was of Mantis. I reverted it back. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]