Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Arbeideren (Hamar) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 9, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that competitors of the Hamar newspaper Demokraten (later Arbeideren) refused to mention it by name in their columns? |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Not a bad looking article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- good
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- good
- C. No original research:
- good
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- good
- B. Focused:
- good
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- good
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- good
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- good
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- good
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- In the Labour Party Period section, the two images seem to be sandwiching the text between them, and I think the text "First World War" should link to "World War I" instead of redirect, so to look like this "First World War"; other than that, the article looks fine and meets the criteria
- Pass or Fail:
Categories:
- GA-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- Low-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- GA-Class Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles