Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template editor
- WMSR (t · th · c (template space · edit requests) · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · templates created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I am mostly requesting this to make edits to the rail-interchange template. I was previously granted temporary template editor permission but it has elapsed. I did not make extensive use of it because I didn't want to do anything wrong. That said, my knowledge of template syntax has improved considerably since I started editing routemap templates (and I know that my skill level was a concern the first time around) so I am hoping this will go through so that I can contribute more. Thanks! WMSR (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Edits since June '19 request (Standard Guidelines review):
- NA (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 9+)
- 200 (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~2100)
- 400 (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1200)
- NA
- 2 (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~2)
- NA (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~4)
- Note that since this is an evaluation, I have included the number since the original request. The values in () are the "guideline review" values and reflect the appropriate totals. Primefac (talk) 23:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- I genuinely don't know what to say with regard to this request. On the one hand, the previous TE-grant has expired, so it makes sense to re-request access. On the other hand, the talk page of Template:Rail-interchange as it currently reads sounds like TE is the last thing that should be granted. There are both fulfilled requests and apologies for making mistakes and/or not feeling comfortable with the edits. There are some minor issues mentioned on their talk page as well.
- I'd like to get Redrose64's opinion on the editor, since the three of us have been fairly heavily involved in {{rint}} editing and it's the main focus of the reason for requesting. Primefac (talk) 23:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Those are totally valid criticisms and I understand the need for further discussion. I would like to point out that every mistake I've made has been a minor one—nothing had any adverse impact on the template as a whole or any major impact on a particular output. Once a mistake I've made has been pointed out, I am consistently able to figure out exactly what the mistake was and correct it. Once a policy or consensus agreement is pointed out to me, I abide by it, but I haven't gone through every talk page archive of the WikiProject and there isn't a set style guide for route diagrams. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do (or work on) to make approval a more palatable scenario. Best, WMSR (talk) 00:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- I also forgot to include a permalink to my original application in this one. [Here it is.] WMSR (talk) 00:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- How about granting for another temporary period (say, another two months)? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: I certainly wouldn't complain :) WMSR (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- How about granting for another temporary period (say, another two months)? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Done, again temporarily. The occasional mistake is okay (we all make them) but please demonstrate a strong competence with the process behind TPERs and template editing. Primefac (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Jfhutson (t · th · c (template space · edit requests) · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · templates created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I went inactive for a few years but I'm back. I mostly used the right back in the day on Template:Bibleverse, and that is what I'd like to use it for again. It is broken in several ways, which is the inevitable result of its inherited uses across the pedia, but I will be careful to test everything in the sandbox! JFH (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Link to original request. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Procedural note, user went inactive ~9mo after receiving this permission, and did not edit any templates/modules (only sandboxes) during that time period. Primefac (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to grant the request, if there is no objection. The community's trust in this user is not lower and there are any number of reasons a user might be inactive. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Procedural note, user went inactive ~9mo after receiving this permission, and did not edit any templates/modules (only sandboxes) during that time period. Primefac (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Done — xaosflux Talk 00:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)