Talk:Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | A news item involving Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 February 2022. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Requested move 24 February 2022
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine be renamed and moved to 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian conflict. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis → 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian conflict – 'Conflict' more precisely describes the situation, being the type of crisis Kehkou (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
This is not a merger request! There will still be two separate articles, so "separation of articles" is not a valid argument here (and should not be counted toward consensus). I see now that maybe Leadup/Prelude to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is a much better name than "conflict" but I think it is too late to change that. We would have to hold a whole new discussion. This is not a response to any particular editor, but rather of the recent trends here. Kehkou (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- support Now as we edge into the hundreds with the confirmed deaths from both sides, it can definitely be classes as a conflict. user:EditorialGuide 14:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Waddles 🗩 🖉 02:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Support per Kehkou and Waddles. It is generally agreeable that this event has spun into something worse than a crisis. PenangLion (talk) 02:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)- Support Definitely a conflict. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 02:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- I hope this is just a normal crisis to be honest. 02:42, 24 Febuary 2022 (UTC)
- Hold Why not wait for a while, at least until midday 24 Feb? And then creating a new article 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war might be due, moving this one to Run-up to 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war.Axxxion (talk) 02:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait – It is much too early to decide what this article will be called. We need to see two things 1) what actually happens in the coming days and 2) what reliable sources call those events, if and when they occur. At this point, there is no way to know what the common name will be (and there certainly isn't a common name for what's happened up until now), and furthermore, without a WP:CRYSTAL ball, we simply cannot determine how things will proceed. There is WP:NODEADLINE on Wikipedia, and we are WP:NOTNEWS. Wait, wait wait. RGloucester — ☎ 02:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:CRYSTAL. The article should be named for what has actually happened, not what is predicted to happen, no matter how confident those predictions are. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support since Putin just announced special operations into Donbass (aka declared war) BWellsOdyssey (talk) 03:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait per RGloucester. Wikipedia is not news and we do not report updates on current events live. If the situation changes by tomorrow, then I'll support renaming or even potentially creating a new article. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 03:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait Although a defacto state of war now exists, per above, we are not a news source. This will likely be 100% supported tomorrow (US time). JustAnotherWikiUser0816 (talk) 03:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support They just launched an invasion, it's a war.--Garmin21 (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's been war for Ukraine since 2014...I guess people don't remember. RGloucester — ☎ 03:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- They just hit Kharkiv with missiles.--Garmin21 (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support move to "2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine"
Breaking: massive explosions just now in Kramatorsk. At least four. Very big.
[1] And from two WaPo reporters:Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia is undertaking a "special military operation" in Ukraine saying his goal is to demilitarize and denazify the country but not occupy it.
[2]I’m hearing booms in Kharkiv.
[3] XOR'easter (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)“President Putin has chosen a premeditated war that will bring a catastrophic loss of life and human suffering,” President Biden says
, via CNN's White House correspondent. XOR'easter (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- ALT1: support move to Leadup to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine - The complementary/sub- article 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine already exists based on rough consensus by active editors for a split; some non-so-active contributors to the article want to wait a week for formal consensus on a split and one editor has hit the WP:3RR limit there. Better un-redirect that article if there is sufficient support rather than start a new article. Renaming this article to Leadup to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and doing some transfers of material would make sense in terms of WP:RS, theme and WP:SIZESPLIT. (The Kalanchak border post appears to have been overrun and the webcam went offline; not a WP:RS, though. Another non-WP:RS, Bryce Wilson, based in Kramatorsk, claims that "Kramatorsk has been attacked".) Boud (talk) 03:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Casting WP:ASPERSIONS, and for what. That's fine. I spent years contributing to these articles, from the moment this nonsense started in 2014. I am trying to get people stop and think before they proceed, and to follow Wikipedia guidelines. But if you want to forge ahead and create a mess, that's your prerogative. Enjoy. RGloucester — ☎ 03:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @RGloucester: My apology - I only meant to refer to this particular article. I don't have an overview of the older articles since 2014. Boud (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Endorse ALT1 as alternate namespace if the final state of consensus warrants it. -Kehkou (talk) 10:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Casting WP:ASPERSIONS, and for what. That's fine. I spent years contributing to these articles, from the moment this nonsense started in 2014. I am trying to get people stop and think before they proceed, and to follow Wikipedia guidelines. But if you want to forge ahead and create a mess, that's your prerogative. Enjoy. RGloucester — ☎ 03:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait. It's all uncertain, until the dust settles then we discuss. PenangLion (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Wait per WP:CRYSTAL. Let's see if an enduring common name comes up in a few days or so. I don't think we need to start move request after move request in this article. It's fine the way it is, for now. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Oppose since there is now an actual article for the intervention itself. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)- Support move to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine - there are now reports of multiple explosions in Ukraine. This is not a WP:CRYSTAL situation anymore. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, wait. That article already exists. In that case, I'll take the example of the July crisis and oppose any move on this article; since the current one is appropriate and concise enough. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support now. Multiple sources announcing military action, Putin just announced military action. CaffeinAddict (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support move to "Prelude to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine", or similar title. Reyne2 (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, reliable sources are now confirming that it is indeed a conflict (my initial concern was going off of Twitter rumors during the fog of... conflict, if you will). See e.g. WaPo front page as of UTC 04:00 "Russia begins attacks on Ukraine". WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 04:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Wait until RS's give us an idea of what wording to use, which should not take long. I appreciate that there is a sense of urgency here, but we cannot just make determinations based on hearsay and tweets from journalists. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 03:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC) - Support This cannot be anything else but a conflict, likely a major one. Any move would be quickly justified within the next few hours regardless due to the seeming scale of the attack already. ArbDardh (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)ArbDardh
- But, if that were the case, the word we'd want is 'war', not the euphemism 'conflict'. All the more reason to wait. RGloucester — ☎ 03:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait A conflict implies that there is fighting from both sides. Ukraine has not, to my knowledge, returned any artillery fire or made assaults on Russian garrisons in Donetsk or Luhansk. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oops, just learned that Putin plans to actually invade. Never mind, I Support now. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 03:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nominator and above. Maanshen (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nominator and above. Redoct87 (talk) 03:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per nominator. -- Mainly 03:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nominator and above, it's fog of war at this point. RazrRekr201 Msg me Contribs
- 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine exists. Reuters. UN Security Council live. Boud (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment As this article is about the buildup primarily, and the invasion began only in 2022. Should this article stay as the lead up and a seperate article be devoted to the actual war/invasion?Strong Oppose Clearly invasion article is devoted to the conflict and this is just the prelude events prior to 2/24. Yeoutie (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- There is a big organisational problem. We have Russo-Ukrainian War, this article, 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. There will need to be a major restructuring, but we are not in a position to do this now. RGloucester — ☎ 03:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @RGloucester Personally I find it pretty conflicting. It will be likely merged upon a newer consensus like the example you stated earlier (Donbas). Hope everything goes smoothly with the articles. Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 04:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- There is a big organisational problem. We have Russo-Ukrainian War, this article, 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. There will need to be a major restructuring, but we are not in a position to do this now. RGloucester — ☎ 03:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Putin declare war... OspreyPL 03:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support: The U.N. Security Council's emergency security meeting is convening; France's representative called Russian's actions "war". Conflict is certainly warranted. Will likely be need to be adjusted as more information develops. Svenskbygderna (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose this article should continue to be described as a crisis and should not include events past the 24th of February. instead it should remain as a description of the events leading up to the subsequent invasion, like the July crisis was for WW1 IAmSeamonkey (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Opposewp:CRYSTAL applies; active combat has not started. Let's not jump the gun. 142.157.192.122 (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Changed to Wait, as it appears that there are possibly signs of a conflict being reflected in RS, on both the russian, and the ukrainian sides, ie TASS, informburo ukrainy. 142.157.192.122 (talk) 05:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Landing troops on foreign soil and the imposition of active fighting and conflict, makes it an active conflict. Attacking several cities in geographically varied parts of a country makes it an invasion. Cyali (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral - Not sure what to call it. But definitely, Russia has invaded Ukraine & won't be retreating, unless forced to by military means. GoodDay (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Russia has begun bombardment of Ukraine, including bombing of Ukraine's capital Kyiv. As such, this is now a conflict.--Beneficii (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- NB There is already a separate article for the war that has begun -- 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.Axxxion (talk) 04:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wait per above. I'd especially lean on Axxxion's idea of changing this article to "Lead-up" or something to that effect. QuietHere (talk) 04:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Axxxion Would your idea be similar to the July Crisis? PenangLion (talk) 05:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Rather, along the lines of Lead-up to the Iraq War. For there is no history books with the set name for this series of events.Axxxion (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- I feel this idea could work as well, but uncertainties certainly hindered the decisions. PenangLion (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Rather, along the lines of Lead-up to the Iraq War. For there is no history books with the set name for this series of events.Axxxion (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose as 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is already an article. Furthermore, at the top of that article it states this one is about the build-up to the invasion, not the invasion itself. YttriumShrew (talk) 05:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - forces have launched operations. —WildComet talk 05:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose There is already a separate article for today's invasion, this article should be about the crisis preceding it. Mellk (talk) 05:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support since the situation has definitely exceeded the quota for a conflict. AlexUsanov961 (talk) 05:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose now that 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is an article and is explicitly not included within the scope of this article. ~BappleBusiness[talk] 06:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose as there is now a separate article for the invasion (2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine), this should remain about the preceding crisis. — csc-1 06:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not that it isn't a conflict and what's going on is wrong to be called that; just that what's been going on for over 8 years has been the ongoing "conflict" and, frankly, calling it this one-year thing doesn't go far enough in renaming what is, without getting into definitions or being too OTT, the start of a full-blown invasion and war. The "crisis" was the build-up and recognition of DNR/LNR, what's happening now is a major escalation into something much, much worse. If we're going on how other similar events have been documented, it seems more like a multi-page thing, e.g. 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. — Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 06:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose because now there is a separate article (2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine). I'd prefer to keep this one covering the leadup to the war. P1221 (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose probably the subject matter covered by this article should be retitled something like Prelude to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, but let's hold off shuffling stuff about. VQuakr (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose There is already a separate article about the invasion. (2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine) 👨🏻💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) maimai (☑️ rights) D'oh! 09:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support This has now turned into an ongoing armed conflict. 09:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C06:2709:2500:C874:2B3E:976:F4CF (talk)
- Oppose as 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine now exists. I also support keeping this article as is. –Davey2010Talk 11:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose original suggested move as others have said their is already an article about the build up to that conflict. However, I wouldn't object to the alternative new title suggested as it may be more clear but could be a bit premature right now.--Llewee (talk) 11:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, hoping that page get semi protected too.Larrayal (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - forces have launched operations. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support: No longer a crisis, certainly has escalated into a conflict due to the invasion. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 13:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Crisis is a sufficient descriptive name; the armed conflict has been split out into its own article. --Jayron32 13:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Merge - Merge in to existing article Russia-Ukraine war Sparkle1 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose since invasion now has a page of its own. Also oppose merge until we see whether this war will be fast or not. If it is, then we could probably synthetize all information into a single page. But we can't know yet. Super Ψ Dro 14:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Merge both articles into page. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 14:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is an article; any war will likely be short, as Russia cannot sustain a drawn-out war, so continued resistance is highly likely. A political solution would end the invasion, but continue the crisis. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 15:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Putin's removal from office would be a political solution, but anyways. GoodDay (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, but favor a rename to Prelude to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Neutralitytalk 15:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Waitor Merge - Only time will tell if this becomes a full conflict, but merging with 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine seems like it may be a great idea as well. A normal peep (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Crisis has become conflict - I would now say Support or Merge. A normal peep (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral - We may make a decision regarding this after first or second week of March Aryan B128 (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Even with the additional article (2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine) about the current invasion I still support a name change. The fact that we have seperate subpage I think just strengthens the need for a name change. Rovastar (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Call it what it is. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose – I think this would cause additional confusion for readers. The creation of the invasion article has made this RM obsolete. The current title helps to distinguish this article's scope (the recent escalation and "crisis") from the wider "conflict" (covered at Russo-Ukrainian War) and the actual invasion (covered at 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine). I'm open to Neutrality's suggestion above ("Prelude to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine"), although I prefer the current title. Jr8825 • Talk 21:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Bacon Noodles. 777burger user talk contribs 22:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support name change, as the crisis has now turned into an all-out conflict. The word "conflict" can also be a synonym for "war," whereas the word "crisis" is more ambiguous.Davidbena (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - A crisis is a build-up to a potential conflict, usually consisting of diplomatic actions. As Russia has undertaken military action, this is no longer a crisis but a conflict. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - per Rovastar. --ChetvornoTALK 00:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think the better way to organize the articles would be to have an article on the crisis that preceded the invasion (which this one should be) and an article for the invasion itself (available here) and a third article for the broader Russo-Ukrainian conflict (available here). Structuring the article so that the invasion is a subarticle of this one seems like the wrong way to go about things. — Mhawk10 (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - Leave the article as-is and have it be about the lead-up to the invasion. PolarManne (talk) 02:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Main article about the eight-year war is Russo-Ukrainian War. This article is about the eleven months of buildup. A new article should be started on this new offensive per WP:summary style. —Michael Z. 03:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Neutrality and Jr8825. Booyahhayoob (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose That was crisis, similar to Cuban Missile Crisis, rather than conflict. A conflict typically implies direct military interaction between opposing sides. The recent invasion or the Russo-Ukrainian War, for example, could be described as a conflict, but not as a crisis. Brandmeistertalk 11:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Changing vote to oppose - Separation of articles makes this move illogical, also per Brandmeister. Currently the consensus is inconclusive. PenangLion (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support move to "2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian conflict". I agree with Rovastar that this page should be moved even though we have the main 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine article. SpookiePuppy (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The invasion and the diplomatic crisis preceding it are both worthy of separate articles. Jsnider3 (talk) 00:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per a Mhawk10 -- HurricaneEdgar 03:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose It's best to have two separate but related articles. TFD (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Mhawk10 and Neutrality. Support better name to cover all geopolitical aspects that led to the outbreak of this war. Pious Brother (talk) 05:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose per @Brandmeister:. Ytpks896 (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per Mzajac — most events in the 2021–22 window prior to the actual February invasion are best regarded as part of the 2014–present crisis, and I believe it makes the most sense to have an overview article for those and a separate article for the invasion covering both the invasion itself and the subsequent conflict. Krinn DNZ (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - its a conflict, technically an invasion. It wasn't a crisis - that's too ambiguous. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support - From 24.02.2022 it's a strict conflict, an invasion with all aspect. Krzysztof Popławski (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, and for events from 24.02.2022 onwards we have 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. The invasion isn't the scope of this article. Super Ψ Dro 09:59, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Crisis is the standard term used to describe the diplomatic escalation in the leadup to a war. The events leading up to the invasion didn't involve direct conflict, so that would be misleading.Mozzie (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Mhawk10, Mzajac and krinndnz. User:Em-mustapha talk 20:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
This is not a merger request! There will still be two separate articles, so "separation of articles" is not a valid argument here (and should not be counted toward consensus). I see now that maybe Leadup/Prelude to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is a much better name than "conflict" but I think it is too late to change that. We would have to hold a whole new discussion. This is not a response to any particular editor, but rather of the recent trends here. Kehkou (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Close as stale / no consensus - the situation has changed so much since this discussion opened that most of the comments older than ~3 days are out of date. A new discussion can be opened if a new title is still deemed necessary. Ibadibam (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, older ones are OoD and newer ones miss the point entirely. Kehkou (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Agree per Khekou. PenangLion (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Russian claims of nuclear armament
2/27/22 the russians have stated that they will be arming nukes[1] should we add this? Diepanzerwaffles (talk) 17:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Putin puts Russia's nuclear forces on alert as fighting in Ukraine continues". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2022-03-01.
War
This isnt a crisis its a war. You are being used by kremlin to spread their propaganda by not calling it an invasion 109.173.217.77 (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- @109.173.217.77: You're looking at the wrong article. You want either Russo-Ukrainian War or 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. — Czello 20:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2022
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected redirect at 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
From: Continued violence and escalation To: Continued escalation
From: The next day, the mission confirmed the death of a child in Russian-occupied Donbas, but failed to establish a link between the purported "Ukrainian drone strike" and the child's death.[107]
To: The next day, the mission confirmed the death of a child in Russian-occupied Donbas, but failed to establish a link between the purported "Ukrainian drone strike" and the child's death.[107]. Russian media had previously fabricated a story of child getting killed by Ukranian shelling in 2015[1] VainiusI (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Crisis?
What would have to happen to call this conflict a war instead of a "crisis"? Matrek (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Matrek Then it won't fit the description of the events. A war is an intense armed conflict: this crisis is not. There are no formal territorial incursions by the Russian forces. PenangLion (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Excuse me? There is no what? No Russian military incursion on Ukrainian territory? Or just "no formal"? What does that mean? Russian tanks and infantry around Kyiv and shelling civilian areas in the city are what, sightseeing trip? Matrek (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- I guess you have not realized that there are at least 28 articles covering the entire topic. Look at the infobox, look at the dates. PenangLion (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Excuse me? There is no what? No Russian military incursion on Ukrainian territory? Or just "no formal"? What does that mean? Russian tanks and infantry around Kyiv and shelling civilian areas in the city are what, sightseeing trip? Matrek (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Matrek See the move request above. There is an article for both the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the overall Russian-Ukrainian War. I do agree, however, that a better, more neutral name is needed.Kehkou (talk) 22:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class Ukraine articles
- Top-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- B-Class Russia (politics and law) articles
- Politics and law of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- B-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Requested moves
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates