Ferdinand I of León: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Here are added the references and relevant information that i deleted, I put it again
Line 36: Line 36:
| religion = [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholicism]]
| religion = [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholicism]]
|}}
|}}
'''Ferdinand I of León''' (''c''. 1015 – 24 December<ref name=deathsource/> 1065), called '''the Magno''' (''el Magno'') and '''the Great''' (''el Grande''), was [[Count of Castile]] was from 1029 and [[List of Leonese monarchs|King of León]] since 1037 to his death, being anointed as such June 22 of 1038.
'''Ferdinand I of León''' (''c''. 1015 – 24 December<ref name=deathsource/> 1065), called '''the Magno''' (''el Magno'') and '''the Great''' (''el Grande''), was [[Count of Castile]] was from 1029 and [[List of Leonese monarchs|King of León]] since 1037 to his death, being anointed as such June 22 of 1038. According to tradition, he was the first to have himself crowned [[Emperor of Spain]] (1056), and his heirs carried on the tradition. He was a younger son of [[Sancho III of Navarre]] and [[Mayor of Castile]], and by his father's will recognised the supremacy of his eldest brother, [[García Sánchez III of Navarre]]. While Ferdinand inaugurated the rule of the Navarrese [[Jiménez dynasty]] over western Spain, his rise to preeminence among the Christian rulers of the peninsula shifted the locus of power and culture westward after more than a century of Leonese decline. Nevertheless, "[t]he internal consolidation of the realm of León–Castilla under Fernando el Magno and [his queen] [[Sancha of León|Sancha]] (1037–1065) is a history that remains to be researched and written."<ref name=reilly7>Reilly 1988, 7–8.</ref>


He was the son of [[Sancho III of Pamplona]], called "the Major" [[List of Navarrese monarchs|King of Pamplona]], and of [[Mayor of Castile|Muniadona]] sister of [[García Sánchez of Castile]]. He was designated [[Count of Castile]] in 1029, {{Sfn|Martínez Díez|2007|p=181}} although he did not exercise effective government until the death of his father in 1035. He became [[Kingdom of León|King of León]] by his marriage to [[Sancha of León|Sancha]], sister of his king and lord, [[Bermudo III of León]], against which he took up arms, who died childless fighting against Ferdinand in the [[Battle of Tamarón]] {{refn|group=lower-alpha|«"the "Najerense Chronicle" and the "Chronicle of Don [[Lucas de Tuy]]" repeat the same story, while Rodrigo Jiménez de Rada, away almost two centuries, introduces an inaccurate detail as locate the death of king Vermudo along the Carrión River, certainly have confused the place of Tamarón, located about twenty kilometers west Burgos, with the most important and well-known town of Támara (Province of Palencia), which is actually not far from the Carrión River.» {{Harvnp|Martínez Díez|2005|p=726, Volume II}} }}
He was the son of [[Sancho III of Pamplona]], called "the Major" [[List of Navarrese monarchs|King of Pamplona]], and of [[Mayor of Castile|Muniadona]] sister of [[García Sánchez of Castile]]. He was designated [[Count of Castile]] in 1029, {{Sfn|Martínez Díez|2007|p=181}} although he did not exercise effective government until the death of his father in 1035. He became [[Kingdom of León|King of León]] by his marriage to [[Sancha of León|Sancha]], sister of his king and lord, [[Bermudo III of León]], against which he took up arms, who died childless fighting against Ferdinand in the [[Battle of Tamarón]] {{refn|group=lower-alpha|«"the "Najerense Chronicle" and the "Chronicle of Don [[Lucas de Tuy]]" repeat the same story, while Rodrigo Jiménez de Rada, away almost two centuries, introduces an inaccurate detail as locate the death of king Vermudo along the Carrión River, certainly have confused the place of Tamarón, located about twenty kilometers west Burgos, with the most important and well-known town of Támara (Province of Palencia), which is actually not far from the Carrión River.» {{Harvnp|Martínez Díez|2005|p=726, Volume II}} }}
Line 59: Line 59:
Ferdinand married in 1032 with [[Sancha of León|Sancha]], the bride of his deceased uncle, who brought as dowry the land between the rivers [[Cea (river)|Cea]] and [[Pisuerga]].<br/>
Ferdinand married in 1032 with [[Sancha of León|Sancha]], the bride of his deceased uncle, who brought as dowry the land between the rivers [[Cea (river)|Cea]] and [[Pisuerga]].<br/>


In 1037 Bermudo III took to wife [[Jimena Sanchez]], daughter of [[Sancho III of Pamplona|Sancho Garcés III of Pamplona]], and his wife, Queen [[Mayor of Castile|Muniadona of Castile]], which became brothers by twice the three kings: [[Bermudo III of León]], [[Ferdinand I of León|Ferdinand]] and [[García Sánchez III of Pamplona]], and claimed that land, which it led to war between the three brothers-in-law kings. Some authors believe that this moment is when Count Ferdinand changed its title to "king of Castile", although no knowledge of that.
In 1037 Bermudo III took to wife [[Jimena Sanchez]]<ref name=reilly7/>, daughter of [[Sancho III of Pamplona|Sancho Garcés III of Pamplona]], and his wife, Queen [[Mayor of Castile|Muniadona of Castile]], which became brothers by twice the three kings: [[Bermudo III of León]], [[Ferdinand I of León|Ferdinand]] and [[García Sánchez III of Pamplona]], and claimed that land, which it led to war between the three brothers-in-law kings. Some authors believe that this moment is when Count Ferdinand changed its title to "king of Castile", although no knowledge of that.

Contemporary documents stress his status as count and his relationship of vassalage to the king of León. A document issued by his brother Ramiro on 22 August 1036 at San Juan de la Peña was drawn while "emperor Bermudo [was] reigning in León and count Ferdinand in Castile, king García in Pamplona, king Ramiro in Aragon, and king Gonzalo in Ribagorza."<ref>Martínez Díez 2007, 182: ''regnante imperator Veremundo in Leione et comite Fredinando in Castella et rex Garsea in Pampilonia et rex Ranimirus in Aragone et rex Gundisalbus in Ripacorça''.</ref> Two private Castilian documents dated 1 January 1037 both express Ferdinand's continuing vassalage to the Leonese monarch explicitly, dating themselves by the reign of "king Bermudo and Ferdinand, count in his realms".<ref>In the first Rodrigo Téllez, on the occasion of his entering the monastery of San Pedro de Arlanza, donated his inheritance in [[Jaramillo]] to the monastery (Martínez Díez 2007, 182: ''rex Vermudo et Fredinando comes in regnis suis''). The second was issued by Ferdinand's great aunt, the Abbess [[Urraca of Covarrubias]], and reads: ''Facta carta conparationis die sabbato, ipsas kalnedas januarias, era TLXXV<sup>a</sup>, rex Virimudo et Frenando comes in regnis suis'' (Martínez Díez 2007, 182).</ref>

Although Sancho was recognised as the ruler of Castile until his death, Ferdinand was granted the title "count" (''comes'') and was prepared to succeed in Castile. On 7 July 1029, before a council in [[Burgos]], the capital of Castile, Óneca, aunt of the late García and queen Mayor, formally adopted Sancho and Mayor, making them her heirs. The record of the council is the first recorded instance of Ferdinand bearing the title of count.<ref>Martínez Díez 2007, 150: ''regnante gratia Dei, principe nostro domno Sanctio et prolis eius Fredinando comes'' ("[now] reigning [[by the grace of God]], the prince our lord Sancho and his son count Ferdinand").</ref> A later charter from the monastery of [[San Pedro de Cardeña]], dated 1 January 1030, explicits lists Sancho as king in León (the overlord of Castile) and Ferdinand as count in Castile.<ref>Martínez Díez 2007, 150: ''regnante rex Sancio in Legione et comite Fernando in Castella'' ("[now] reigning king Sancho in León and count Ferdinand in Castile").</ref> The first indication that Ferdinand was independently reigning over Castile, or was at least recognised as count in his own right, is a charter of 1 November 1032 from the monastery of [[San Pedro de Arlanza]], which does not mention his father, but dates it to the time of "Fernando Sánchez bearing the county".<ref>Martínez Díez 2007, 150: ''Factum ... ipsas kalendas novembrii, era MLXX currente, Fredinando Sanzii comitatum gerente'' ("[this charter was] made ... these kalends of November, currently Era 1070 [AD 1032], Ferdinand [son] of Sancho holding the county").</ref> Sancho's decision to name his son as count in Castile preserved its high degree of autonomy, although no Castilian document after 1028 is dated by the reign of Bermudo III nor is he ever named as king of León. The only sovereign whose regnal year was used was Sancho III, making Ferdinand the first count of Castile not to recognise the suzerainty of the king of León.<ref>Martínez Díez 2007, 150–51.</ref>


==King of León (1037–65)==
==King of León (1037–65)==

Revision as of 19:30, 9 July 2016

Ferdinand I
Fernando I in a medieval miniature preverved in the Cathedral of León.
Emperor of all Spain
Reign1056–1065
Coronationc. 1056
PredecessorVacant
Bermudo III
SuccessorVacant
Alfonso VI
King of León and Castile
Reign1037–1065
Coronation22 June 1038 (León)
PredecessorBermudo III (in León)
SuccessorSancho II (Castile), Alfonso VI (León) and García II (Galicia)
Count of Castile
Reign1029–1037
PredecessorGarcía Sánchez
Successortitle in abeyance
Bornc. 1015
Died24 December[1] 1065 (aged 49–50)
León
Burial
Basilica of San Isidoro
ConsortSancha of León
IssueUrraca of Zamora
Sancho II
Elvira of Toro
Alfonso VI
García II
DynastyJiménez
FatherSancho III of Navarre
MotherMunadiona of Castile
ReligionRoman Catholicism

Ferdinand I of León (c. 1015 – 24 December[1] 1065), called the Magno (el Magno) and the Great (el Grande), was Count of Castile was from 1029 and King of León since 1037 to his death, being anointed as such June 22 of 1038. According to tradition, he was the first to have himself crowned Emperor of Spain (1056), and his heirs carried on the tradition. He was a younger son of Sancho III of Navarre and Mayor of Castile, and by his father's will recognised the supremacy of his eldest brother, García Sánchez III of Navarre. While Ferdinand inaugurated the rule of the Navarrese Jiménez dynasty over western Spain, his rise to preeminence among the Christian rulers of the peninsula shifted the locus of power and culture westward after more than a century of Leonese decline. Nevertheless, "[t]he internal consolidation of the realm of León–Castilla under Fernando el Magno and [his queen] Sancha (1037–1065) is a history that remains to be researched and written."[2]

He was the son of Sancho III of Pamplona, called "the Major" King of Pamplona, and of Muniadona sister of García Sánchez of Castile. He was designated Count of Castile in 1029, [3] although he did not exercise effective government until the death of his father in 1035. He became King of León by his marriage to Sancha, sister of his king and lord, Bermudo III of León, against which he took up arms, who died childless fighting against Ferdinand in the Battle of Tamarón [a]

His first sixteen years of his reign were spent resolving internal conflicts and reorganizing his kingdom. In 1054, the border disputes with his brother García III of Pamplona turned into open warfare. The Leonese troops killed the King of Navarre in the Battle of Atapuerca.

He conducted a vigorous activity of Reconquista, taking the places of Lamego (1057), Viseu (1058) and Coimbra (1064). He also underwent several of the Muslim Taifa kingdoms to payment of parias to the Leonese kingdom. When he died he divided his kingdom among his sons: the firstborn, Sancho, accounted for the income statement of his father, the County of Castile, elevated to the rank of Kingdom, and the parias on the Taifa kingdom of Zaragoza; to Alfonso, the favorite, it accounted for the Kingdom of León and the imperial title, and the rights on the Taifa kingdom of Toledo; García received the Kingdom of Galicia, created for this purpose, and the rights on the Taifa kingdoms of Seville and Badajoz; to Urraca and Elvira corresponded them the cities of Zamora and Toro, respectively, also with royal title, and an adequate income.

Traditionally it has been considered the first king of Castile and founder of the Spanish monarchy, and many historians still maintain this thesis. However, some of the most current historiography considers that Ferdinand was not king of Castile and that the origin of this kingdom is at the death of this monarch, with the division of their states between their children and the legacy of Castile to the firstborn Sancho with royal title. In the words of Gonzalo Martínez Diez:

We can and must say with absolute certainty that Ferdinand was never king of Castile, and that its nature as a county, subordinate to the King of León, never changed and it did not become a kingdom until the death of Ferdinand I the year 1065. (translation)[4]

Date and order of birth

There is some disagreement concerning the order of birth of Sancho III's sons, and of Ferdinand's place among them. He was certainly a younger son, and he was probably born later than 1011, when his parents' marriage is first recorded.[5] Most, and the most reliable, charters name Sancho's sons in the order Ramiro, García, Gonzalo, then Ferdinand. Three documents from the Cathedral of Pamplona list them in this way,[6] as well as four from the monastery of San Juan de la Peña.[7] One charter from Pamplona, dated 29 September 1023, is witnessed by Sancho's mother, Jimena Fernández, his wife Mayor, her children, listed García, Ferdinand then Gonzalo, and their brother, the illegitimate Ramiro.[8]

In five documents of the monastery of San Salvador de Leire, Ferdinand is listed after Gonzalo.[9] Two of these are dated to 17 April 1014. If authentic, they place Ferdinand's birth before that date.[10] Three further documents from Leire are among the only ones to place Ferdinand second among the legitimate sons, but they suffer from various anachronisms and interpolations.[11] Two preserved diplomas of Santa María la Real de Irache also put Gonzalo ahead of him.[12] On the basis of these documents, Gonzalo Martínez Díez places Ferdinand third of the known legitimate sons of Sancho III (Ramiro being a bastard born before his marriage to Mayor), and his birth no earlier than 1015.[5] The Crónica de Alaón renovada, which Martínez Díez dates to 1154, but which other scholars dismiss as a late medieval concoction, lists García, Ferdinand and Gonzalo as Sancho III's sons by Mayor in that order, but in the same passage mistakenly places Gonzalo's death before his father's.[13]

Count of Castile (1029–37)

The future Ferdinand I of León had to be born after 1015, and there is no assurance that was the second scion of Sancho III "the Major", as traditionally had believed. Most of the authentic documents of the time place him as the fourth of the sons of the King of Pamplona after Ramiro I of Aragon, García Sánchez III "the one of Nájera" and Gonzalo of Sobrarbe and Ribagorza. In 1029, when he accessing the Castilian county, Ferdinand did not exceed thirteen.[14] When the Count Sancho de Castilla died in 1017, he left as his heir García Sánchez, a child of seven years, which began a turbulent period for the Castilian County. Alfonso V of León recovered the lands between the rivers Cea and Pisuerga, conquered years ago by Sancho, while Sancho "the Major" intervened to protect his younger brother-in-law, taking advantage to seize several border places.

When García Sánchez of Castile, in 1027, reached the age of majority, tried to strengthen ties marrying Sancha, sister of the young King of León Bermudo III. However, was assassinated in 1028 by the sons of the Count of Vela, who they fled from Castile. The Leoneses saw in this death the hand of the King of Pamplona, ​​and the Castilians a Leonese conjure. In any case, Sancho "the Major", left favored of the assassination: to not have children the deceased Count García, Sancho invoked the rights of his wife Muniadona to rule in Castile, [15] and designate his son Ferdinand as Count of Castile in 1029, "his authority" was "fully recognized and legitimated"[16] Ferdinand married in 1032 with Sancha, the bride of his deceased uncle, who brought as dowry the land between the rivers Cea and Pisuerga.

In 1037 Bermudo III took to wife Jimena Sanchez[2], daughter of Sancho Garcés III of Pamplona, and his wife, Queen Muniadona of Castile, which became brothers by twice the three kings: Bermudo III of León, Ferdinand and García Sánchez III of Pamplona, and claimed that land, which it led to war between the three brothers-in-law kings. Some authors believe that this moment is when Count Ferdinand changed its title to "king of Castile", although no knowledge of that.

Contemporary documents stress his status as count and his relationship of vassalage to the king of León. A document issued by his brother Ramiro on 22 August 1036 at San Juan de la Peña was drawn while "emperor Bermudo [was] reigning in León and count Ferdinand in Castile, king García in Pamplona, king Ramiro in Aragon, and king Gonzalo in Ribagorza."[17] Two private Castilian documents dated 1 January 1037 both express Ferdinand's continuing vassalage to the Leonese monarch explicitly, dating themselves by the reign of "king Bermudo and Ferdinand, count in his realms".[18]

Although Sancho was recognised as the ruler of Castile until his death, Ferdinand was granted the title "count" (comes) and was prepared to succeed in Castile. On 7 July 1029, before a council in Burgos, the capital of Castile, Óneca, aunt of the late García and queen Mayor, formally adopted Sancho and Mayor, making them her heirs. The record of the council is the first recorded instance of Ferdinand bearing the title of count.[19] A later charter from the monastery of San Pedro de Cardeña, dated 1 January 1030, explicits lists Sancho as king in León (the overlord of Castile) and Ferdinand as count in Castile.[20] The first indication that Ferdinand was independently reigning over Castile, or was at least recognised as count in his own right, is a charter of 1 November 1032 from the monastery of San Pedro de Arlanza, which does not mention his father, but dates it to the time of "Fernando Sánchez bearing the county".[21] Sancho's decision to name his son as count in Castile preserved its high degree of autonomy, although no Castilian document after 1028 is dated by the reign of Bermudo III nor is he ever named as king of León. The only sovereign whose regnal year was used was Sancho III, making Ferdinand the first count of Castile not to recognise the suzerainty of the king of León.[22]

King of León (1037–65)

Ferdinand I and his wife Sancha of León (circa 1055). The kings receiving the codex of hands of the author. Note the small lion head crown the scepter of King.

The conflict between brothers-in-law is elucidated in the Battle of Tamarón on 4 September 1037. The Castilian troops came reinforced by the army of King García III of Pamplona. Bermudo III of León, with the momentum of his own age, spurred his horse Pelagiolo and introduced into the enemy lines, where he was killed pierced by a Castilian lance. The Leoneses carried his body to León and deposited, along with his parents, in the pantheon of the Church of San Juan.

Bermudo to die childless, was his sister Sancha, wife of Ferdinand, her successor on the throne. However, the Leoneses took some time to accept the new monarchs. For months the Count Fernando Flaínez (uncle of the knight El Cid and grandfather of Jimena Díaz)[23] he refused to surrender the city whom he considered a usurper, if not a murderer. According to the Silense Chronicle, Ferdinand arrived from Sahagún (from "the ends of the Gallaecia"). Finally, after securing his position in the Curia Regia, Ferdinand and his wife entered peacefully in León, and "in the era of M.LXX. VI to X of the kalendas of July (22 June 1038) was consecrated Don Ferdinand in the church of Santa María of León (León Cathedral) and anointed King by Servando, bishop of happy memory of that church."

The same chronicle says that in the first sixteen years of his reign could not make inroads against the Mohammedans, occupied in subjecting the nobility of the kingdom. This is confirmed by the Chronica Naierensis:

Busy for sixteen years to resolve the internal conflicts of his kingdom and taming the fierce spirit of some of the magnates, any foray outside its borders not could take against external enemies.

He confirmed the Fuero of León, given by his deceased father-in-law, Alfonso V of León, commanded to continue observing the Visigoth code as the fundamental law of the Leonese kingdom, and he adapted to the habits and customs of his new kingdom, probably influenced by his wife Queen Sancha.

Relations with Navarre

"The Dragon gives his power to the Beast (adding the comment). Apoc. XI", page 191 of the Beatus de Facundus, commissioned by Ferdinand I and Sancha, circa 1047.

On 15 September 1054, Ferdinand defeated his elder brother García at the Battle of Atapuerca and reduced Navarre to a vassal state under his late brother's young son, Sancho García IV. Although Navarre at that time included the traditionally Castilian lands of Álava and La Rioja, Ferdinand demanded the cession only of Bureba.[2] Over the next decade, he gradually extended his control over more of the western territory of Navarre at the expense of Sancho IV, although this was accomplished peacefully and is only detectable in the documentary record.[24]

Relations with al-Andalus

War with Taifa of Zaragoza

In 1060, according to the Historia silense, Ferdinand invaded the taifa of Zaragoza through the upland valley of the eastern Duero in the highlands around Soria. He captured the fortresses of San Esteban de Gormaz, Berlanga and Vadorrey, and afterwards proceeded through Santiuste, Huermeces and Santamara as far as the Roman road that lay between Toledo and Zaragoza.[25] The success of the campaign was made possible by the preoccupation of the Zaragozan emir, Ahmad al-Muqtadir, with attacking the neighboring taifa of Tortosa and defending his northeastern frontier from Ramiro I of Aragon and Raymond Berengar I of Barcelona. The emir, up until then paying tribute to Sancho IV of Navarre, submitted to Ferdinand and agreed to pay parias. Although probably originally meant to be temporary, Ferdinand managed to enforce the tribute until his death.[25]

War with Taifa of Toledo

With al-Muqtadir sidelined as a threat, Ferdinand turned his attention to Yahya ibn Ismail al-Mamun, emir of Toledo. It is probable that Ferdinand already maintained close relations with the Toledan court, and was perhaps protector of the Mozarabic Christian community in Toledo. In 1058, the last known Mozarabic bishop of Toledo, Pascual, was consecrated in León. In 1062, Ferdinand invaded the east of al-Mamun's taifa, taking Talamanca and besieging Alcalá de Henares. After seeing his country plundered, al-Mamun agreed to pay parias and Ferdinand left.[26]

Great raid on Taifas of Badajoz and Seville

In 1063, using the new income from his parias, Ferdinand organised a "great raid, or razzia" into the taifas of Seville and Badajoz. Seville, and probably Badajoz also, paid a ransom for his withdrawal. This attack was probably also designed to remove Badajoz as a threat during his siege of Coimbra the next year.[26]

Reconquests in current Portugal (at that time does not exist)

File:Map ferdinand I of kingdon of Leon 11th century.jpg
Expansion of the Kingdom of León during the reign of Ferdinand I (1037-1065). Legend: Green: Taifas of al- Alndalus, Red arrow: Attacks of Ferdinand I, Light blue: Leonese conquests.

Although the sources are unclear, it is possible that as early as 1055 Ferdinand attacked the taifa of Badajoz. His first serious campaign of Reconquista was an invasion of the lower basin of the Duero between the coast, which had long been held by León, and the mountains. On 29 November 1057 his army conquered Lamego and its valleys.[24] Having secured the Duero, Ferdinand began to bring the valley of the Mondego under his control, first taking Viseu in its middle stretch on 25 July 1058 and then moving down towards the sea. It was "a long and grueling battle" before Coimbra, at the mouth of the Mondego, was taken on 25 July 1064 after a six-month siege.[24]

War with Taifa of Valencia

In 1065, Ferdinand embarked on his last military campaign. He invaded the taifa of Valencia and got as far as the vicinity of the city itself, where he defeated the emir Abd al-Malik al-Muzaffar late in the autumn. The emir's father-in-law, al-Mamun of Toledo, seized control of Valencia, and the frightened emir of Zaragoza renewed his tribute payments to León. Ferdinand fell ill in November and returned to his kingdom.[26]

Emperor of Spain

Ferdinand was first titled "emperor" not by himself or his own scribes, but by the notaries of his half-brother, the petty king Ramiro I of Aragon, whose notaries were also calling Ferdinand's predecessor as king of León by the same title. In a royal Aragonese charter of 1036, before the Battle of Tamarón, Ramiro refers to his brother as "emperor in Castile and in León and in Astorga".[27] A similarly-worded charter was issued in 1041 and again in 1061, where the order of kingdoms is reversed and Astorga ignored: "emperor in León and in Castile".[28] The first use of the imperial style in a charter of his own, preserved in the cartulary of Arlanza, dates to the year 1056: "under the rule of the emperor King Ferdinand and the empress Queen Sancha ruling the kingdom in León and in Galicia as well as in Castile".[29] On this basis, Ferdinand is sometimes said to have had himself crowned emperor in 1056.

The imperial title was only used on one other occasion during his reign. A document of 1058 dates itself "in the time of the most serene prince Lord Ferdinand and his consort Queen Sancha" and later qualifies him as "this emperor, the aforesaid Ferdinand".[30]

Death and succession

File:Division of the kingdom of León to the death of Leonese king Ferdinand I (1065).jpg
Division of the Kingdom of León to the death of Leonese king Ferdinand I, between his sons, in kingdoms of Galicia, León and Castile. Note as all Al-Andalusian Taifas owing tributes to the Christian kingdoms (except Taifa of Granada). Legend: Green: Taifas of al-Andals; Blue arrow: Leonese attacks; Red arrow: Castilian attacks; Two swords: Battle with Leonese victory, Battle with Castilian victory, Battle of uncertain result; Asterisk: Kingdom with internal revolts.

After becoming ill during the Siege of Valencia and the Battle of Paterna, Ferdinand died on 24 December 1065, in León,[1] with many manifestations of ardent piety, having laid aside his crown and royal mantle, dressed in the robe of a monk and lying on a bier covered with ashes, which was placed before the altar of the Basilica of San Isidoro.[31] By his will, Ferdinand divided his kingdom among his three sons: the eldest, Sancho, received Castile; the second, Alfonso, León; and from the latter the region of Galicia was carved off to create a separate state for García. Ferdinand's two daughters each received cities: Elvira that of Toro and Urraca that of Zamora. In giving them these territories, he expressed his desire that they respect his wishes and abide by the split. However, soon after Fernando's death, Sancho and Alfonso turned on García and defeated him. They then fought each other, the victorious Sancho reuniting their father's possessions under his control in 1072. However, Sancho was killed that same year and the territories passed to Alfonso.

Posthumous reputation

See also: Crucifix of Ferdinand and Sancha

The Chronicon complutense, probably written shortly after Ferdinand's death, extols him as the "exceedingly strong emperor" (imperator fortissimus) when mentioning the siege of Coimbra.[32] After his death, Ferdinand's children took to calling him "emperor" and "the great" (magnus). In 1072, Alfonso, Fedinand's second son, referred to himself as "offspring of the Emperor Ferdinand".[33] Two years later (1074), Urraca and Elvira referred to themselves as "daughters of the Emperor Ferdinand the Great [or, the great emperor Ferdinand]".[34] In a later charter of 1087, Ferdinand is referred to first as "king", then as "great emperor", and finally just as "emperor" alongside his consort, who is first called "queen" then "empress".[35]

In the fourteenth century a legend appeared in various chronicles according to which the Pope, the Holy Roman Emperor, and the King of France demanded a tribute from Ferdinand. In certain versions the Pope is named Urban (although it could not have been either Urban I or Urban II) and in other versions Victor (which is plausibly identifiable with Victor II).[36] Ferdinand was prepared to pay, but one of his vassals, later known as El Cid, who in reality was a youth during Ferdinand's reign, declared a war on the Pope, the Emperor and the Frank, and the latter rescinded their demand. For this reason "Don Fernando was afterwards called ‘the Great’: the peer of an emperor".[37] In the sixteenth century this account re-appeared, extended and elaborated, in Juan de Mariana, who wrote that in 1055, at a synod in Florence, the Emperor Henry III urged Victor II to prohibit under severe penalties the use of the imperial title by Ferdinand of León.[38]

This story is generally regarded as apocryphal, although some modern authors have accepted it uncritically or seen a kernel of historical truth in it. Spanish historian A. Ballesteros argued that Ferdinand adopted the title in opposition to Henry III's imperial pretensions.[39] German historian E. E. Stengel believed the version found in Mariana on the grounds that the latter probably used the now lost acts of the Council of Florence.[40] Juan Beneyto Pérez was willing to accept it as based on tradition and Ernst Steindorff, the nineteenth-century student of the reign of Henry III, as being authentically transmitted via the romancero.[41] Menéndez Pidal accepted the account of Mariana, but placed it in the year 1065.[42]

Ancestry

Family of Ferdinand I of León
16. García Sánchez I of Pamplona
8. Sancho II of Pamplona
17. Andregoto Galíndez
4. García Sánchez II of Pamplona
18. Fernán González, Count of Castile (=#24, 30)
9. Urraca Fernández
19. Sancha Sánchez of Pamplona (=#25, 31)
2. Sancho III of Pamplona
20. Bermudo Núñez, Count of Cea
10. Fernando Bermúdez de Cea
21. Argilo
5. Jimena Fernández
22. Diego Muñoz, Count of Saldaña (=#28)
11. Elvira Díaz
23. Tegridia (=#29)
1. Ferdinand I of León and Castile
24. Fernán González, Count of Castile (=#18, 30)
12. García Fernández, Count of Castile
25. Sancha Sánchez of Pamplona (=#19, 31)
6. Sancho García, Count of Castile
26. Raymond II, Count of Ribagorza
13. Aba of Ribagorza
27. Gersende de Fezensac
3. Mayor of Castile
28. Diego Muñoz, Count of Saldaña (=#22)
14. Gómez Díaz, Count of Saldaña
29. Tegridia (=#23)
7. Urraca Gómez
30. Fernán González, Count of Castile (=#18, 24)
15. Muniadona Fernández of Castile
31. Sancha Sánchez of Pamplona (=#19, 25)

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Some sources give the feast of John the Baptist, 24 June, as the date of his death.
  2. ^ a b c Reilly 1988, 7–8.
  3. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, p. 181.
  4. ^ Martínez Díez 2005, p. 713, Volume II.
  5. ^ a b Martínez Díez 2007, 151–53.
  6. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152. They are, by date: 7 April 1014, albeit improperly dated (Ranimirus, proles regis, confirmat. Garseanus, frater eius, confirmat. Gundisaluus, frater eius, confirmat. Fernandus, germanus eius, confirmat.); 21 October 1022 (Garsias et Ranimirus, Gundesalbus et Fernandus, testes.); and 1033 (in presencia de filios regis pernominatos Ranimirus, Garseanus, Gundesaluus, Fredinandus), found in Jaime Goñi Gaztambide, Colección diplomática de la catedral de Pamplona (829–1243) (Pamplona: 1997), docs. 5, 7, 12.
  7. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152. Although all of these one contain anachronisms, they are not entirely worthless. They are: two dated 21 April 1028, one of 1030, and one from 5 April 1031, found in Antonio Ubieto Arteta, Cartulario de San Juan de la Peña, I (Valencia: 1962), docs. 47–48, 51, 56.
  8. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152: Sunt testes: Eximina regina et mater regis, regina dompna Maiora cum filiis suis dompno Garsia et Fredinando et Gundesalbo et fratre eorum Ranimiro in Goñi Gaztambide 1997, doc. 8.
  9. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152. They are dated 21 October 1022, 26 December 1032, and 1033, found in Ángel J. Martín Duque, Documentación medieval de Leire (siglos IX a XII) (Pamplona: 1983), docs. 20, 23, 24.
  10. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152. They read: Domina Maior regina confirmat. Ranimirus proles regis confirmat. Garseanus frater eius confirmat. Gundisaluss frater eius confirmat. Ferdinandus frater eius confirmat., in Martín Duque 1983, docs. 15–16.
  11. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 153. Two date to 21 October 1015 and another to 29 September 1023, found in Martín Duque 1983, docs. 17–18, 21.
  12. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 152–53. They are both dated 1024, one to 17 May, and are found in José María Lacarra, Colección diplomática de Irache, I (958–1222) (Zaragoza: 1965), docs. 2, 4.
  13. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 84.
  14. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, pp. 151–154.
  15. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, pp. 135–151.
  16. ^ Martínez Díez 2005, p. 693, Tomo II.
  17. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 182: regnante imperator Veremundo in Leione et comite Fredinando in Castella et rex Garsea in Pampilonia et rex Ranimirus in Aragone et rex Gundisalbus in Ripacorça.
  18. ^ In the first Rodrigo Téllez, on the occasion of his entering the monastery of San Pedro de Arlanza, donated his inheritance in Jaramillo to the monastery (Martínez Díez 2007, 182: rex Vermudo et Fredinando comes in regnis suis). The second was issued by Ferdinand's great aunt, the Abbess Urraca of Covarrubias, and reads: Facta carta conparationis die sabbato, ipsas kalnedas januarias, era TLXXVa, rex Virimudo et Frenando comes in regnis suis (Martínez Díez 2007, 182).
  19. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 150: regnante gratia Dei, principe nostro domno Sanctio et prolis eius Fredinando comes ("[now] reigning by the grace of God, the prince our lord Sancho and his son count Ferdinand").
  20. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 150: regnante rex Sancio in Legione et comite Fernando in Castella ("[now] reigning king Sancho in León and count Ferdinand in Castile").
  21. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 150: Factum ... ipsas kalendas novembrii, era MLXX currente, Fredinando Sanzii comitatum gerente ("[this charter was] made ... these kalends of November, currently Era 1070 [AD 1032], Ferdinand [son] of Sancho holding the county").
  22. ^ Martínez Díez 2007, 150–51.
  23. ^ Torres Sevilla-Quiñones de León 2002, p. 44, n. 27.
  24. ^ a b c Reilly 1988, 9–10.
  25. ^ a b Reilly 1988, 10–11.
  26. ^ a b c Reilly 1988, 11–12.
  27. ^ García Gallo 1945, 226 n. 70: Regnante me Ranimiro ... et Fredelandus imperator in Castella et in Leione et in Astorga ("me, Ramiro, reigning ... and Ferdinand, emperor in Castile and in León and in Astorga").
  28. ^ This latter, from García Gallo 1945, 226 n. 71, reads "King Ramiro reigning in Aragon ... Ferdinand, emperor in León and in Castile" (Regnante Ramiro rege in Aragonie ... Fredelandus imperator in Leione et in Castella).
  29. ^ García Gallo 1945, 213 and 226 n. 72: sub imperio imperatoris Fredinandi regis et Sancie regine imperatrice regnum regentes in Legione et in Gallecia vel in Castella.
  30. ^ García Gallo 1945, 213 and 226 n. 72: in tempore serenissimi principis domni Fredinandi et ejus conjugis Sanciae reginae and perrexerunt ad ipsum imperatorem jam dictum Fredenandum.
  31. ^ Reilly 1988, 13.
  32. ^ García Gallo 1945, 213 and 226 n. 74, partially quotes the Chronicon′s entry: rex Ferdinandus cum coniuge eius Sancia regina, imperator fortissimus, simul cum suis episcopis ... obsedit civitatem Colimbriam ("King Ferdinand with his consort Queen Sancha, the exceedingly strong emperor, likewise with his bishops ... besieged the city of Coimbra").
  33. ^ García Gallo 1045, 226 n. 73: Ego Adefonsus regis, prolis Fredinandi ymperatoris.
  34. ^ Ego Urraka et Giluira, Fredinandi imperatoris magni filie (García Gallo 1045, 226 n. 73).
  35. ^ García Gallo 1045, 226 n. 73: "I, Urraca, daughter of King Ferdinand ... to the reigning Emperor Alfonso son of Emperor Ferdinand the Great and Queen Sancha ... I, Urraca, daughter of that king and emperor Ferdinand and Empress Sancha" (Ego Urraca prolis Fredinandi regis ... Adefonso imperatore regnante Ferdenandi magni imperatores et Sancie regine filio ... Ego Urraca filia ejusdem regis et imperatoris Federnandi et Sancie imperatricis).
  36. ^ García Gallo 1945, 213–14. The most likely king of France is Henry I, although Philip I also fits. The Emperor would have been Henry III, or possibly his father, Conrad II.
  37. ^ García Gallo 1945, 214: fué llamado Don Fernando el Magno: el par de emperador.
  38. ^ García Gallo 1945, 214, citing Menéndez Pidal 1929, I, 137–38, and López Ortiz 1942, 43–46.
  39. ^ In Revista de Archivos, Bibliotecas y Museos, 40 (1919): 473, cited in García Gallo 1945, 226 n. 78.
  40. ^ Kaisertitel und Souveränitätsidee: Studien zur Vorgeschichte des modernen Staatsbegrifts (Weimar: 1939), 7–8, 11–13, 15–16, and 23, cited in García Gallo 1945, 226 n. 78.
  41. ^ España y el problema de Europa: contribución a la historia de la idea de imperio (Madrid: 1942), 46–48, cited in García Gallo 1945, 226 n. 78; Steindorff 1881, 484ff.
  42. ^ He further suggested that the Spanish reaction against Rome encouraged a later Castilian nationalist reaction against the Spanish "empire", cf. García Gallo 1945, 214, citing Menéndez Pidal 1929, I, 138 and 256–64, who completely rejects this thesis.

Bibliography

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ferdinand I of León and Castile.
  • García Gallo, Alfonso. "El imperio medieval español". Arbor, 4,11 (1945): 199–228. [Reprinted in Historia de España, Florentino Pérez Embid, ed. (Madrid: 1953), 108–43.]
  • López Ortiz, José. "Las ideas imperiales en el medioevo español". Escorial, 6 (1942): 43–70.
  • Martínez Díez, Gonzalo. Sancho III el Mayor: Rey de Pamplona, Rex Ibericus. Madrid: Marcial Pons Historia, 2007.
  • Pérez de Urbel, Justo. "La división del reino por Sancho el Mayor." Hispania, 14, 54 (1954): 3–26.
  • Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. La España del Cid, 2 vols. Madrid: Editorial Plutarco, 1929.
  • Reilly, Bernard F. The Kingdom of León-Castilla under King Alfonso VI, 1065–1109. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
Ferdinand I of León
Born: circa 1015 Died: 24 December 1065
Regnal titles
Preceded by Count of Castile
1029–1037 		Succeeded by
title in abeyance
Preceded by
Bermudo III
(in León)
 King of León
1037–1065 		Succeeded by
Sancho II (in Castile)
Alfonso VI (in León)
García II (in Galicia)
Vacant
Title last held by
Bermudo III 		Emperor of Spain
1056–1065 		Vacant
Title next held by
Alfonso VI


Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ferdinand_I_of_León&oldid=729082735"