Talk:Michael of Zahumlje/GA1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Wüstenfuchs (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. ...' |
Wustefuchs (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Wustefuchs|Wustefuchs]] ([[User talk:Wustefuchs|talk]]) 05:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC) |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Wustefuchs|Wustefuchs]] ([[User talk:Wustefuchs|talk]]) 05:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
This article is sourced very good, since ther are no many sources for this person. Neutral point of view is very important to the good article status, and this arcile fits to this demand. Ther is also only one red link in the article, wich is good. The fact is that it is very hard to find images (none of them exists) for this person, so we have decent nomber of files in the article. Ther is no a single edit made since 6 January 2011, and ther was no edit wars. This article can pass as good article.--[[User:Wustefuchs|Wustenfuchs]] ([[User talk:Wustefuchs|talk]]) 19:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:43, 15 January 2011
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wustefuchs (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
This article is sourced very good, since ther are no many sources for this person. Neutral point of view is very important to the good article status, and this arcile fits to this demand. Ther is also only one red link in the article, wich is good. The fact is that it is very hard to find images (none of them exists) for this person, so we have decent nomber of files in the article. Ther is no a single edit made since 6 January 2011, and ther was no edit wars. This article can pass as good article.--Wustenfuchs (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)